Dr Lasha Darkmoon
Kevin MacDonald’s review of Wilhelm Marr’s pamphlet, Der Sieg des Judenthums über das Germanenthum, 1879, (“The Victory of Judaism over Germanism”), is a fascinating compendium of pessimistic quotations in which German political pundit Marr concludes gloomily that there was no hope left for Germany. It was finished — yes, as early as the 1870s. The Jews, he lamented, were simply too formidable a foe. Marr’s pamphlet ends with these chilling words:
Let us accept the inescapable, since we cannot change it. Its name is: FINIS GERMANIAE — the end of Germany!
I confess I had no idea the outlook was so bleak in Germany as early as 1879. (Marr’s pamphlet has recently been translated into English and is now available in pdf format). I had been under the false impression that the notion of Jewish domination came much later — after the publication of the Protocols (1903) and the Russian Revolution (1917).
We have seen it all happen though. Germany was brought to its knees, exactly as Marr predicted. Its cadaver now lies rotting.
Exactly a year ago, the state of Israel demanded from Germany a further 1 billion Euros ($1.4 billion) in Holocaust reparations for its endlessly traumatized Jewish survivors. Sixty-five years after World War II, the grim extortion racket continues unabated.
The subject that interests me — and which should be of vital importance to Americans undergoing an almost identical trauma at the hands of organized Jewry today — is the question: to what extent was Germany in the days before Hitler’s rise to power a dress rehearsal for what we are witnessing in America right now? What are the parallels? Is it time to write America’s obituary?
Is it time to say, FINIS AMERICAE — the end of America?
Here is a pertinent, relatively modern quotation which will serve as a useful coda to the doomladen citations from Marr. Read it carefully. It will not only hammer home the points made by Marr several decades earlier, it will also provide the reader with a sharp reminder of the parallel situation in which America finds itself today.
With one significant difference: America is in a far worse condition.
Historian Sir Arthur Bryant summarizes Jewish power in pre-1933 Germany:
It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities…They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich [my emphasis]. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation… But to those who had lost their all, this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions…
The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions [in spite of constituting] less than one percent of the population [my emphasis]… The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press — all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed… The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly…
Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation [my emphasis]. … At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination. … It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed — and lavishly displayed — by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle. Sir Arthur Bryant, Unfinished Victory (1940) (slightly edited for brevity)
Throughout history, Christianity, and especially the Catholic Church, has been a countervailing force against organized Jewry — against a “stiff-necked” people who, while claiming spotless innocence and invariably framing their detractors as irrational and pathological haters, have nevertheless been expelled from no fewer than 109 locations since the year AD250.
Why has contemporary Christianity failed so abysmally to stand up to the encroachments of organized Jewry and its influence?
The Christian Zionists and organized Jewry: fools conned by knaves
Despite its history as the only Western institution that has been able at times to resist Jewish power, the Catholic Church, of which I am a hopelessly dysfunctional practising member, has proved to be an acute disappointment. It has been thoroughly subverted from within and without. It offers neither guidance nor leadership. So forget the Catholics—a spent force.
One is also forced to conclude that there is little hope that American Protestants could come to the rescue. Their infatuated legions — particularly the 60 million Christian Zionists who constitute the most influential group among them — are in many ways as rabid as the fanatical Jews who seem to have infected them with their zealotry, egging them on to find solace in eschatological ecstasies and millenarian mumbojumbo.
Life is indeed so empty and sterile for these wretched lumpengoyim that the only thing that excites their sluggish sensitivities is the prospect of Armageddon and the thought of universal and catastrophic death — the quicker the better.
Whipped into a frenzy of religious fervor by the Grahams and the Robertsons, the Falwells and the Hagees, the Lindseys and the La Hayes, these Christian Zionists have become imitation Jews almost indistinguishable from Vladimir Jabotinski and Baruch Goldstein. They believe in a Greater Israel — entailing further conquests of Arab Land — and in the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. They have “adopted” illegal settlements and they directly finance the bulldozing of Palestinian homes, the uprooting of olive trees, and the daily oppression of the rightful owners of the Holy Land. They pray every Sunday in their vast soulless churches for the destruction of Iran. And if push came to shove, they would gladly give their blessings to genocide — and call it “the will of God.”
Fifty million evangelical Christians unite with five million American Jews, standing together on behalf of Israel....The man or nation that lifts a voice or hand against Israel invites the wrath of God.”
There are now 80,000 fundamentalist pastors and clergy preaching their message of madness to these ill-educated Christian masses — in many ways as gullible and gormless as medieval peasants. The pernicious views of their “pastors” are disseminated by 1000 local Christian radio stations as well as 100 Christian TV stations. See here.
Consider the unimaginable war crimes committed by the state of Israel just over a year ago in Gaza. The world saw it happen. Judge Goldstone saw it happen. His meticulously documented report makes it abundantly clear that Israel is a criminal nation and that its politicians and generals are steeped in criminality.
Yet here is Grace Halsell: “Every act taken by Israel is orchestrated by God, and should be condoned, supported, and even praised by the rest of us.”
When I first read this, I couldn’t believe my eyes. Was this woman crazy? Where had she been since 1948? Hadn’t she heard of the Goldstone Report? Did she have no inkling of Israeli war crimes: of Deir Yassin (1948), the Lavon affair (1954), the Sabra and Shatila war crimes (1982), Qana (17 villages wiped out 1996), the Jenin massacre (2002), the Lebanon and Egyptian terrorist attacks and the atrocities in Iraq from 1990 to the present time, the horrific Gaza invasion of 2009? Had she never heard of the King David Hotel bombing of the British? Had she never heard of the Hebron Mosque massacre by Baruch Goldstein? Had she never heard of the sneak attack on the USS Liberty? Had she never heard of American state secrets sold to the Soviets and Chinese? Had she never heard of white phosphorus and cluster bombs and DIME weapons that slice babies’ bodies in half?
I need not have worried.
Halsell, I was relieved to learn, was being ironic. She opposed Zionism as much as I did — as any sane and reasonable person would.
Why Contemporary America is far worse off than pre-National Socialist Germany
I have been accused of needless defeatism by some of my anti-Zionist colleagues. America is far from dead, they assure me. It’s alive and kicking. It’s just a matter of time before good patriotic Americans rise from their slumber, reclaim lost ground, and take back their country.
I wish I could feel as sanguine about America’s prospects as these optimists do.
I should like to convince you that the problems facing Germany were far less formidable than the problems facing any potential American rescuer today.
One of the serious negative factors facing America today — a problem the Germans never had — is the existence of vast numbers of Christian Zionists in their midst.
Germany of course had to cope with organized Jewry, a group working from within to undermine the foundations of German society. But one scourge Germany did not have, and which America has, is this scourge of a non-Jewish enemy within: the 60 million Christian Zionists acting in cahoots with organized Jewry to oppose the interests of their own people.
America’s Christian Zionists, it would seem, are their own worst enemy — blithely planning their own demise without knowing it.
So here is Problem Number One for those of you who dream that America could once again become the self-conscious ethnic possession of people of European ancestry: What are you going to do with these 60 million White American renegades who have joined forces with the Enemy? Who are as Jewish as Ariel Sharon or Abe Foxman. Who are hand in glove with AIPAC. Who think ADL means ‘Advanced Divine Leadership’.
How are you going to fit these thoroughly Judaized allies of organized Jewry into your White Homeland?
It cannot be done. So you have a big problem.
Israel and its Jewish-American Double Agents
Another big problem America needs to solve that Germany did not have to cope with is the state of Israel and its powerful lobby in America. Germany did not have Israel hanging round its neck like an albatross. The Germans were not induced to fight wars on behalf of a foreign country. They didn’t invade other countries in order to make the world safe for Israel.
“Since September 11, 2001, the Israeli state, Zionists inside the US government, and the entire leadership of the Major American Jewish Organizations, have been entirely devoted to pushing the US into Middle East wars on behalf of Israel.” — James Petras, see here.
“Today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.” — Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad of Malaysia, in a speech to the Tenth Islamic Summit Conference at Putrajaya, Malaysia, October 16, 2003.
Almost 5,000 U.S. military personnel have now been sacrificed for Israel in Iraq. These are the “officially acknowledged” figures. The real figures have been put at between 50,000 and 70,000 and are now probably higher. (See here and here.) The number of seriously injured soldiers are perhaps ten times the number of the dead. Meanwhile, the number of Iraqis slaughtered amount to 1.3 million, with four times as many driven into neighboring countries as homeless refugees. The cost to the American taxpayer is (to date) $980 billion, with a total cost of $3 trillion projected if and when the mindless carnage is ever complete. See here.
I think that even the enemies of Zionism before 1948 failed to appreciate the extent to which organized Jewry would maximize its power once it had acquired its own headquarters and homeland — complete with its own military arsenal and espionage facilities. Archimedes provides a hint in his famous quote on the lever, often loosely translated as: “Give me a place to stand and I will move the world.” The Jews now have “a place to stand” — and they certainly are “moving the world.”
The Germans, in addition, did not have a powerful Jewish Lobby holding the entire German government to ransom. German politicians, unlike American ones, were not on Israel’s payroll via campaign contributions from AIPAC and its fabulously rich Jewish supporters. These political donations or “reward money” are bribes in all but name.
Apart from the carrot, there is of course the stick, wielded to good effect by organized Jewry against all American critics of Israel. “Their willing use of force, money and media slander,” James Petras points out, “intimidates any and all critics, including dissident politicians, media, journalists and professors.”
In pre-WW2 Germany, the Mossad did not exist. No Mossad was around to monitor the Internet activities of German politicians to see what financial or sexual shenanigans they were up to. Today, in America, it is reasonable to assume that there is constant surveillance of American politicians by Mossad — if not by AIPAC, the ADL, and their various affiliates. Indeed, the ADL famously settled a spy case that yielded documents with 10,000 names and 600 organizations thought to be insufficiently slavish toward Israel. Legal filings from the case showed that an ADL agent had a floor plan and a key for the office of Alex Odeh, a murdered Arab American leader.
It follows that the potential for blackmailing American politicians (by Israel’s agents) must today be enormous. Sibel Edmonds asks rhetorically, “Are American politicians being blackmailed? Is grass green?” Her answer: “Of course the blackmail scenario is possible; in fact, highly possible.”
Seven crucial points need to be hammered home. They show that America is now in a critical situation from which nothing can save it. Nothing except a military coup or violent revolution.
1. Germany did not have to cope with 60 million Christians Zionists collaborating with the goals of organized Jewry; America does.
2. Germany did not have the state of Israel to finance, nor did it have to fight Israel’s wars; America does.
3. Germany’s population of Jews was relatively small compared to America’s: less than 1% of 80 million (roughly 522,000 Jews in 1933) compared to contemporary America’s 2% + of 309 million (over 6 million Jews).
4. Since Israel had yet to be founded, Germany did not have the problem of dual citizens whose primary allegiance is to a foreign country.
5. Although there were Jewish activist organizations in Weimar Germany, they had not achieved the power and influence of the Jewish ethnic infrastructure in the US. Organizations like AIPAC, the ADL, the SPLC, the American Jewish Committee, and the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations (to name a few) are lavishly funded and influential in all areas of American life, including law enforcement, foreign policy, and all things multicultural.
6. Jews have also erected the Holocaust Industry as a powerful guilt machine for White Americans. Traditional American culture has been substantially replaced by the culture of the Holocaust and various other non-White victimhoods, endlessly played out in the movies, television shows, and in the schools, all the way from kindergarten through the university.
7. Above all, Germany was never threatened with multiculturalism. Promoting multiculturalism has been the focus not only of various influential Jewish intellectual movements, it has also been the most important goal of the organized Jewish community, especially since World War II. Multiculturalism is a deadly weapon against Western civilization — a WMD of truly devastating lethality that in the long run will destroy Christianity, traditional moral values, and traditional nationalist cultures in North America, Europe, and Australia. It will also result in the dispossession and disempowerment of the White race.
Conclusion: the situation facing America is a grim one. An epidemic of escalating severity threatens us all. In the course of time, this epidemic of evil is likely to infect Eurasia and spread to other parts of the world.
The future looks unimaginably bleak.
Dr. Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic, age 31, with higher degrees in classics. A published poet and translator, she is also a political activist with a special interest in Middle Eastern affairs. ‘Lasha Darkmoon’ is a pen name.
From John Spritzler:
Lasha Darkmoon writes, “Multiculturalism is a deadly weapon against Western civilization — a WMD of truly devastating lethality that in the long run will destroy Christianity, traditional moral values, and traditional nationalist cultures in North America, Europe, and Australia. It will also result in the dispossession and disempowerment of the White race” and includes an Uncle Sam Wants You graphic that refers to “Whites” as the victim.
Darkmoon’s racialist thinking is poison. Whose welfare should we be concerned with? Whose values should shape all of society everywhere on the planet? Whose side should we be on in the struggle against the oppressors (who include, but by no means are limited to, Zionists)? The answer to this question, my friends, is NOT the “White race”, as Lasha Darkmoon asserts. First of all, there is no such thing as the “White race.” Second, if there were such a thing, it would include some oppressors and it would exclude many of the oppressed. Racialist thinking is a trap. The elite push it in order to get oppressed people to ally with oppressors of the same “race” and to view fellow human beings like themselves as the enemy because they are of the wrong ‘race.” It is POISON!
Dark skinned bus drivers and white skinned bus drivers of the world have infinitely more in common when it comes to basic values and aspirations than either has in common with a billionaire banker sharing their same skin color or religion or language. And you can replace ‘bus driver’ with a million other similar occupations.
Frankly, if I don’t see a robust refutation of racialist poison on this list when it is expressed by articles such as this one by Darkmoon, then I will leave the list. My anti-Zionism is only one aspect of my anti-racialism; I am as opposed to “white people” racialism as I am to “Jewish people” racialism. They are both poison. I consider those who aggressively administer this poison to be agents of the enemy, witting or otherwise.
I would like to take some time to respond to your criticism. I value your contributions in general, and would hate to see you leave Shamireaders. Normally I would not respond to an ultimatum such as you have issued here, but in your case I will make an exception:
I agree wholeheartedly with your critique of Lasha Moon’s piece that I posted. The problem is this: you have picked out a fly in her ointment, and justly taken it to task. This piece was published on a White racialist website, so it has that flavor, which is likewise odious to me. However, the piece contained so much that is condign that you fail to acknowledge in passing that I cannot see your criticism in any kind of balanced way. Take out the objectionable racialist admonition here which you take to task, and you have left a scathing and invaluable critique of Zionist/Jewish domination of US foreign policy, which you fail in any way to acknowledge. Thus, I consider your critique valid but extremely unbalanced. The minute you see one thing objectionable, you seem to feel free to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I think here about Shamir’s willingness to associate at times with people like David Duke, despite his objectionable Klan past, because his critique of Zionist domination of America is valid and likewise trenchant. As a friend of mine once put it, you have to learn to pick the flowers and leave the shit behind. Perhaps it would have been helpful if in posting “Darkmoon’s” piece I had written a disclaimer of her racialist slant, but I tend to assume that the sophisticated readers of this list are very capable of doing this for themselves. There is no racialism on this listserve, and I think we can assume that a shared value here is universalism. This will not stop me from posting a formidable piece by David Duke, Lasha Darkmoon, Kevin McDonald, or any number of other accurate critics of Zionism or its domination of US policies, without in the least sharing any racialist implications that may inhere in their approaches.
Let’s all agree to this: Zionism is objectionable in part because of its particularism. There is no particularist solution to the real problems of mankind. You cannot fight the fire of racism (or ethnism) with the same fire (Hitler certainly demonstrated that!). This simply does not supply moral high ground. On the other hand, sometimes it takes a thief to catch a thief, and some racialists are very astute in detecting and exposing the racism of Zionism, and whether for the right reasons or not, are able to articulately object to the overweening Zionist influence in America, as I believe Darkmoon does here. I continue to have faith that those on the Shamireaders list are not about to trade their opposition to the racism of Zionism for support for the racialism of White protectionism or any other racially oriented ideology. But even a broken watch is right twice a day, and racialists may be able to help us perceive the racialism in our agreed adversary, yet this does not mean we need to accept their starting point.
If we say that because someone at some point makes a politically incorrect statement, that the rest of their utterance must be disregarded, then we engage in a kind of ad hominem argument. This is not a high form of criticism. In fact, it is illegitimate. I would encourage you to remain subscribed to Shamireaders, to submit some of your own pieces for publication, and to keep this kind of balanced perspective with respect to what you see published here. This is not a racialist listserve. But some of the writers whose work is posted here may suffer from that malady. Be charitable, and take them for what they are worth.
thank you for your new piece. Meanwhile, a few remarks.
1. Christian Zionists are indeed unpleasant but I doubt they are the formidable force you present. Until very recently, Christian Zionists were considered "antisemites" , and only a few years ago their leaders discovered the charm of Jewish support. If the tide turns, they are likely to turn, too.
2. As for comparison with Germany, the US did not lose a war yet, the situation is not too bad yet, and while the grub is plentiful, they are not likely to quarrel.
3. The idea of white (ok, Euro-Americans) America is a non-starter; you waste your time and talents there. There is no way to separate America's acculturated "coloureds"; and it makes no sense now with President Obama. There are many ways to fight Jewish influence, and the one you choose is doomed to fail.
4. As a non-American, I would not mind if these seekers of white America were just to create a diversion big enough to keep America busy; but even that is not going to happen. If and when the Jewish-led America will embark to a new war, say, against Iran, your patriotic whites will cheer the war.
5. What is the most probable development? A white activist will be used for a large provocation, maybe for an assassination attempt, and thus they will serve the interests of Obama-hating Jews and will become scapegoats.
6. As I wrote, you can be against immigration without all this search for ethnic European America.
7. My friendly advice - give a thought to the above; try to avoid disaster.
Dear Mr Shamir,
...I am not happy with this “White” issue thing. Never have been. I take all your criticisms on board. My ideology is basically similar to yours. I often visit Toronto, a multicultural city. My friends there are of all nationalities. My possible sister-in-law is Indian. From Tamil Nadu. I wonder what she would think if she read my comment about multiculturalism being a “deadly weapon” against Western civilization. She would not understand. She would suspect me of being a secret racist. Which I am not.
I genuinely do believe it’s too late to go back to the past. Ployglot, multicolored communities — maybe this is the future. White Utopias? I can’t really see them working. Well, Mr Shamir, you are a Christian, and you know that comment of St Paul’s about “seeing through a glass darkly.” That’s me. I am groping in the dark for solutions. You must understand that I am in many ways a fish out of water on theoccidentalobserv er. net. Many of the writers there do not meet with my approval. Their obsessions with race and “Whiteness” are not my obsessions. And yet, these people feel beleagured and frightened — that they’re “losing their country”, their jobs, their culture, their traditional values. Their very religion, Mr Shamir — the Christianity you hold so dear — they see it being destroyed in America by organized Jewry’s control of Hollywood, the mass media, and the porn industry which is largely in Jewish hands. So they would seem to have valid grounds for concern. There is much talk nowadays of “violent revolutions” and “military coups”. When hope dies, men get desperate...
Almost every day I am in touch with my dear friend Jill, a Jewish painter in Florida, and so I get a different perspective from her on all these matters. However much I may rage against “organized Jewry” in my articles, Jill knows I don’t hate Jews. No way. My close friendship with her precludes any such possibility.
What I’d like you to do, Mr Shamir, is to publish my future articles on your site in spite of your strong disagreement with me on this multicultural issue. Take the risk. And then feel free on your site to point out my various errors. You have “Shamir Readers”. Let these clever and well-informed commentators feel free to tear me to pieces if they wish. How else can we find truth and wisdom, dear Mr Shamir, unless we engage in free dialogue?
Your sincere admirer,
Stampede the buffalo over the cliff?
You're way too soft on the Jews, ignoring by far most of their black ops --such as Abe, McKinley,
Bernard Baruch's two World Wars, Huey Long, JFK, OKC, Diana & 9/11. At the same time, you swing the axe to try to sever American whites (such as myself) from our natural allies --to wit, the niggers, spics, slopes and their cousins who constitute the overwhelming majority of our race and also a big slice of our home pop. GDEM or "Great Dark-Eyed Majority" way ahead of blue few in recognition of jish _perfidy_ (note also book by this title written by Ben Hecht). By way of personal intro, I will mention having gone to jail for MLK's SCLC, beginning to learn Spanish half a century ago in Mexico, highly successful leadership for a dozen years in the American youth movement in support of Vietnam during war time and my mastery of the most ancient oriental game of strategy usually called in barbarian tongues by its Nip name of _go_.
Whenever the J's spot someone on their bloody trail, their first reaction = trying to nail that party in the public eye as anti-black, too. SOP. Here you fall in with your master MacDonald, much to the glee of the JAPE bosses. That's for "Jewish-American Political Empire" (my coinage). WADRT (="With All Due Respect To") the tiny minority of exemplary professors, this "occidental" swerve be typical academic cowardice & treachery. KMAC's both a most profound scholar and at the same time a back-stabbing sheethead.
To stand up bravely like an honest woman and teach one's fellow whites to extend the hand of friendship to the rest of our race = to light the fuse in the powder room of the jish imperial flagship. Rather harder to get tenure that way, hire learning & all that rot, eh?
We the Seven Billion are evolving a planetary culture, despite the heavy lid of JAPE oppression, that wonder of hyper-leverage.
BTW: a) Maybe we're finally getting close to a translation of the German pamphlet which coined the fateful term "anti-Semite" ? And
b) On a related topic for Ish & Ken: The Clintonz concocted the Bosnian War as a diversionary maneuver to give them cover for the destruction of Iraq, by far the J's main strategic objective in that period. Who can discuss this topic at all without invoking the classic prequel, WAG THE DOG ? Only lack of his eddress stops me CC'ing Gordon Arnaut.
c) Groovy octopic. Thanks for your historical review, up to the point mentioned.