are first interesting responses to the PaRDeS, a new long essay by
Israel Shamir. Some of them are quite shocking, some revealing. The
PaRDes is available for free download on http://www.israelshamir.net
to the PaRDeS:
John Spritzler, the US
just finished reading all of Pardes. I found it
fascinating because it helped me understand (somewhat) -- for the
first time actually -- your overall world view. I see that you use
the phrase "the Jews" (without the quotation marks) to
denote a world view embodied for thousands of years in Jewish
culture and writings -- a world view which individual people (Jew
or not) may adopt or reject, or serve (like the Messiah's Donkey)
without even being aware of it. I also see that your "the
Jews" concept has a lot in common with the modern
capitalist ideology of individualism and rejection of the dignity
of all human beings (seeing them as objects to be exploited). I
think that the source of our agreement on things like opposition
to Zionism and support for a one-state solution where Jews and
non-Jews are all equal and opposition to oppression in general
stems from the fact that your "the Jews" and my
"Capitalism" are concepts that overlap a good deal.
I understand that your "the Jews" is not a nationalistic
(or racist) concept, don't you worry at all that the phrase
(especially without the quotation marks around it) encourages
nationalistic thinking? I do. Why not replace it with something
less susceptible to misuse? I think "the Jews" is a less
useful concept than "Capitalism" for understanding the
world we live in. But I guess we will have to agree to disagree
you for sharing your very eloquently written and
fascinating-to-read Pardes with me.
You have produced a powerful indictment of the morally bankrupt
and intellectually exhausted Masters of the World. Money and
power are far more addictive and debilitating than any mere
narcotic and our Over Lords seem to be so desperate for another
fix that they are willing to risk bringing the whole house down
around them. It's funny in a non-haha way to hear them blame
the poor on welfare for contributing to the collapse of The Empire
through their dependence on food stamps and homeless shelters
while they desperately search for that spare hundred million they
thought they stashed behind the platinum toilet for a rainy day.
My gut feeling is that 'the Jews' are just hired guns, or rather
hired accountants and lawyers, plantation overseers, who went into
that line of work because they had and uncle who could get them on
with CitiBank or ABC. I'm having a really hard time getting
mad at anyone involved in this hell. The devils are the
damned, the damned are devils to the other damned.
am reeling, with horror at the subject matter and awe at what you
have done with it, the depth and breadth not only of your
knowledge but, far more important, your brilliance.
I adore the elegiac prose you cannot NOT use when describing
, and had thought nothing could surpass
Flowers, I think -- no, I KNOW -- you have done so with this one.
have not only seen with greater clarity and depth the very things
we have noticed, you have explained their interconnectedness with
this abhorrent whole.
deepest congratulations to you on the production of a really
superb, monumental treatment of our world and what ails us.
you, Shamir, for making sense of things.
is a tour de force through your main themes.
Gerald Jugant, France
the reading of PaRDeS, I feel the spirit of Simone Weil, but in a
way even more conscious and obvious, you belong to the great
tradition of the Jewish mystic teaching, the Cabbala. Undoubtedly
you attempt to revive this very old, mainly lost, wisdom of
humanity, who has as a base the golden age, the
original paradise, the very old time of the man in harmony with
nature and its own nature.
like the analogy to the troops that do not see the big picture
during war. I sometimes use analogies to neural networks or
the ideas of management theorists when they discuss organizational
am not sure the analysis of New Christian behavior in the
works. The conversion of Jews in
gave them an advantage because they were able to forge even
stronger ties (including marriage) with the aristocracy and
the nobility. The attacks on New Christian behavior seem to
have begun in an internal dispute among connected and
non-connected New Christians. Only later did the argument
and vitriol spread to the larger public.
there certainly are large connections between Ashkenazi and
proto-Ashkenazi communities and Jews of other ethnic groups, and
we can trace these ties back to the 10th century, I am not sure
that the distinction between Ashkenazi Jews and Jews of other
ethnic groups can be ignored. In
there is a certain homogenizing effect because there was a strong
effort to forcibly remold the Jews of other ethnicities to
Ashkenazi thinking, behavior and mores. You probably deal
with the 2nd and 3rd generation descendants of non-Ashkenazi Jews
that came to
. They have been fairly thoroughly deracinated from their
parents and grandparents cultures. In some sense so have
Ashkenazim because of historical developments since the 1830s.
Ashkenazi today is far different from being Ashkenazi circa 1900.
Without Zionism, small communities of religious Jews might have
survived like Zoroastrians, but probably there would be no
serious Jewish ethnic identity today. I think one could take
some of Uri Ram's analysis to argue that Zionists took the core
Ashkenazi identity to create a sort of Jewishness-lite (Yidishkayt-qal)
that they have either disseminated or imposed on Jewish
groups and communities throughout the world. If we follow
Baruch Kimmerling's analysis, we might conclude that
Jewishness-lite succeeded even as Israeli-ness failed.
Jewishness-lite connects Israeli Jews to American Jews and Jews
throughout the world. It would probably even survive the
admit that the notion is really half-baked, but it might provide
an interesting standpoint to analyze Jewish behavior today.
Jewishness-Lite might also work as a catchy book title.
I read your essay, PaRDeS. What I think ? Probably you will shock
many "petit bourgeois". I apologize, but my english is
not good and I follow in french. Je
suis convaincu que vos objectifs sont des plus dignes et je les
partage pleinement. Vous voulez aider les Juifs à leur salut, les
rendre bons, qu'ils mettent leur énergie au service du peuple, de
l'humanité dans son ensemble. Seulement, à ce stade, seule une
élite juive peut vous comprendre et vous suivre dans cette voie.
Je pense qu'Hitler et le nationalisme européen ont fait considérablement
régressé cette perspective d'une solution à la Question Juive,
mais que plus de 50 ans après la guerre et la création de l'Etat
d'Israël, elle se pose à nouveau dans toute sa plénitude.
L'assimilation des Juifs est un processus éminemment complexe et
discutable. Il semble actuellement bloqué tant pour des
raisons historiques que compte tenu des rapports de force mondiaux
et de l'hégémonie (néo) libérale sur l'ensemble de la planète.
Je verrais plutôt la recherche d'un nouvel internationalisme de
citoyenneté mondiale respectueux des identités et des cultures,
dans lequel les Juifs trouvent pleinement à s'épanouir sur des
rapports d'égalité. Comment concilier son identité juive avec
le nouvel universalisme ? La solution passe par la Palestine. Le
choix est un scénario à la sud-africaine ou à l'algérienne.
A la lecture de PaRDeS, je crois quà l'instar de Simone Weil,
mais de manière encore plus consciente et évidente, vous êtes
dans la grande tradition de la mystique juive, de la kabbale. Il
s'agit sans doute aujourd'hui de réssusciter cette sagesse très
ancienne de l'humanité, en grande partie perdue, qui a pour
fondement l'âge d'or, le paradis originel , le temps
très ancien de l'homme en harmonie avec la nature et sa propre
want to thank you for the fine work you have done thus far in
shedding light on the most fundamental issues plaguing our world.
Your essay, Pardes, is rings true on every level. Indeed, you
are doing your job, which, in reality, is the solemn task of all
created beings—to discover the truth and speak it plainly and
unflinchingly. May God continue to guide and bless your endeavors.
and enjoyable to read for it's truth and exposure of the 'great
am not sure if I agree that Jewish intermarriage is always a way
out of Jewry. With American Zionism, it is not that unusual to be
a quasi-Jew, a low-class half-breed Jewish family. Usually when
Jews marry Christians, they still celebrate all the Jewish
holidays in addition to the Christian ones. Most times the
Christian half of the intermarriage is even more vehemently
pro-Israel and anti-Islam than an average Jew, since a display of
fidelity to Jewish causes implies marital fidelity and honor in
agree with you in theory that Jews and others should be free to
intermarry and mix DNA. However, in experience I do not recommend
marriage out of one's culture unless the host culture is actually
willing and able to accept newcomers, which is not usually the
case. I thought it was not important to be until I tried. We had
none of the same common assumptions, language was a huge barrier,
he didn't get my jokes, he hated my food, our interaction styles
were totally different; His fantasies were not my fantasies...but
worst of all the racism of the community. I have no idea how a
Russian convert to Christianity would be treated by his or her
Palestinian in-laws. I know that white or black Americans in
general are never considered real family members by their Arab or
other outside-culture in-laws. They are merely tolerated, if that.
They are obligated to attend family gatherings but they are not
included in the conversations, nor visited in their homes.
loved the idea of the Biblical exegesis style of explaining your
political viewpoints. The only thing was I had to read it 2 or 3
times to get what you were doing. It was unclear what the four
levels meant, and how they connected with the subject matter you
were discussing. With a little redundancy you might be able to
connect your headings and intros and conclusions more clearly.
Like you can say, "I am now going to explain to you what the
Jews want on four different levels, using these terms...The
mystical meaning of these terms relates to this explanation in the
following way..." Otherwise people of lesser intellect such
as myself are forced to flip back and forth back to the overly
brief intro of PaRDeS before the beginning of The Man Higher Up
chapter. Also you didn't clarify if PaRDeS is something you came
up with on your own or is this an old Hebrew concept, or how do
people usually interpret PaRDeS when not connecting it with anti-zionism?
fact, you may wish to begin the entire essay with your explanation
of PaRDes and then go to the battle scene, pedantically explaining
that this is an example illustrating your point ... Again, because
what you are trying to do is very unique and charming and people
should try to get it.
even at the second reading I was unsure how
(peshat) relates to swindlers or a literal reading of swindlers.
It just needed a little further clarification.
quote James Woolsey, "Anti-Semitism threatens the rule of law
and intolerance of Jews is a first step toward dictatorial
rule." This statement is so absurd that it deserves further
are putting forth very bravely a theory, which is accurate, of a
rebellion in Judaism against God. However I think you are still
contradicting yourself in your assertion that the primary struggle
is being waged by The Church on behalf of God against Judaic
Satanism. You say: "Yisrael dwelt in the dead bodies of the
churchless nations." If
is a vampire living in the dead body of the Church, then by your
own admission the Church is dead. The lingering remains of
Christianity smoulder as embers in the Orthodox Christian
, and little embers here and there among the true peacemakers of
the world. But the Church in this debilitated or dead state cannot
fight this war. If there is a struggle going on it is someone
else, not the Church, carrying the torch that Jesus lit.
of all, Lucifer is a creation of God and Lucifer is the enemy of
Mankind. The Eternal Struggle is not, as the Zoroastrians
believed, a war between God and Satan. The Jews are not the enemy
of God, they cannot even hurt God. The Jews are the enemies of
Mankind. The King of
recorded in Islamic Prophecy is a False Messiah, a Pharaoh, a
master magician and rejecter of Truth. But like the Egyptian
Pharaoh of old, this enemy of the Believers is still God's
servant. God uses him to test the Believers and to strengthen them
internally through purification of other than God.
one time, the Children of
were the Believers because they were the followers of the current
prophet of that time, Moses. The covenant was through Moses. Then
came Jesus and the Covenant was made through Jesus because he was
God's prophet of that time. Those who rejected Jesus became
Disbelievers while those who accepted Jesus became the
Ones. After Jesus came Mohammad, who is the prophet that Moses
predicted would be like unto him, who would bring the Law to the
Gentiles and conquer many nations. Jesus also foretold the coming
of Mohammad, the Mercy to Mankind, as the Comforter who would come
after him. (Gospel of John
, and 16:7)
To reject Mohammad is to reject the most recent Covenant with God.
There is no moral excuse for Christians not to accept Mohammad as
their prophet and accept Islam. The Christians rejected God's
prophet, pretending, like the Jews, that Mohammad was perhaps a
great leader of others, but not sent for themselves. Because the
Christians rejected Mohammad as their prophet, God revoked His
Covenant with them. The Christians are now members of a
. That is why God destroyed the Church. Your efforts to reform the
Church and bring Christians back to Orthodoxy is a sweet idea, but
unlikely to work because you cannot go back in time. God's prophet
Mohammad already called the true Christians to accept Islam. There
is no Church that represents God anymore. Mohammad is the Seal of
the Prophet that is the culmination of east and west prophecy,
universalizing the Covenant to the world.
also think that your statement that Jesus came for all of mankind
is not supported by the words of Jesus. What you are quoting is
the philosophical doctrine of Paul. But if you actually read the
Gospel, Jesus is always clear that he came in particular to
admonish the Children of
"These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them saying, Go
ye not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the
Samaritans enter ye not: But go ye rather unto The Lost Sheep Of
The House Of
. " Matthew 10:5-6
you say "Muslim influence is not liable to help besieged
Christendom against its oldest enemy," you are seriously
overlooking something. Your oldest enemy is Satan. Satan was your
enemy before the Jews were your enemy. Islam will save Christian
souls but it will not save the Church. As you mentioned, the
Church has no soul except that it is possessed by a vampire called
Yisrael. Muslims cannot save a corpse.
Muslim influence is lacking because Muslims lack knowledge of
Christ. The true Christians have to join the Islamic community in
order to flood the Muslims' intellectual vacuum with Christ Light.
Not in order to take Muslims away from Islam, but to add to the
power of Islam in order to defeat the enemy. The Church has to
decide what is more important, self-preservation as an institution
or preserving the Covenant of God and fighting for Islam with
Jesus against the Jews. Muslims need the Christians to convert to
Islam in order to counteract the Judaic tendencies of the Wahhabis,
who are actually crypto Zionists.
Christianity dies, it does not mean that the Covenant has been
cancelled. Allah is the Ever-Living. The religion of God is
something alive and present. If the Church does not embody this
spirit, then we must find it elsewhere, for God has promised that
if a group to whom He has given guidance refuses to follow that
guidance, God will raise another people who will follow Him. So we
have to open our eyes. The Arab world is in a state of decline
because the Arabs forgot Jesus and took to nationalism. But there
is no new Covenant. Islam is still the religion of God, and it is
open to the true Believers of any race.
The only group of people on earth who refuse on principle to
accept the legitimacy of the State of
are the orthodox Muslims. It is a religious issue, because they
refuse to consider Jews as the
. For all their faults, they are right
essential issue that you have described. They recognize Judaism as
Satanic. The Christians should stop trying to convert these
Muslims to Christianity and instead, the Christians should join
Islam. The influx of Christian manners into Islamic culture might
be enough of a
morale boost to give victory to the Believers.
The Biblical quote "And I will bless them that bless thee
clear to Muslims. Muslims are the only religious group that every
every ritual prayer invoke blessings upon Abraham, his family, his
descendants and his followers. Whenever you bless a prophet, the
blesses you. The Muslims are the most blessed people on earth in
regard. It is clear that Islam is the religion of Abraham. The
conflict is not Jewish or Christian, as you say, contradicting
Reality is that there is no conflict. There are many universes,
created them all.
My belief is that Zionism can be cured through the Buddha's four
truths. The blend of east and west inevitably leads to Mohammad
Islam. This is the final victory of Truth. It's here.
have just finished the translation of Pardes. It was, as usual
with your writings, but even more so this time, an exceptional
pleasure to work on such a masterpiece from the point of view of
intelligence, wit, style and research.
I am unfortunately not the professional reviewer you might have
wished for this letter - I feel obliged to chance my arm for an
appraisal as I appreciate your kind gesture in sending the whole
text to me.
I have to tell you of a friend with whom, as a convert from the
Protestant religion to the Catholic, I have had many and many an
argument. I finally extracted from him in recent years this
explanation: "my religion and my life are like the perpetual
struggle of Jacob and the Angel, and when I realised that I also
realised that I must commit myself to that struggle for a
to Pardes and you the author. Considering the above anecdote and
many of your essays I might almost find you in the same struggle
and shrug off any serious interest - but quite unlike the artistic
activities of my Irish friend whose windows and paintings cannot
be considered for effect outside his religious
concerns - you, by contrast have pitted your belief and course
against and into a political fracas that many different people are
conjoined to. Because you are tied in this way to a distinctly
living struggle your pursuit of a place in the political struggle
makes me very uneasy, and this uneasiness is actually largely a
result of this document .
one respect I consider your paper an exceedingly dangerous text.
have exhibited in this tremendously energetic writing career a lot
of strength to carry burdens and arguments forward in time toward
the future. What if one of those burdens is not what you believe
it to be?
arrogating freedom seekers of every kind, including of course
freedom from belief in God, as an active example of submission to
the Jewish move to victory over the goy, you are taking an
incredible stance. Can it not occur to you that enclosing all
mankind in a "spiritual" religious argument is an
resume now, from my reading, and from a history of the Jewish
Church that I am also reading, I perforce must come to the
conclusion that the Jewish notion of their difference and
isolation in their notion of being the chosen people of God is
utterly fraudulent. Their relationship to the other Arab races is
very evident is it not? If Abraham could understand his nomadic
journey to the south, if David could acknowledge the crimes of his
militancy, if betrayal which from Abraham on was a central twist
to tribal loyalties between brothers and then entered national
history in David's ancestor, the woman who betrayed her
tribes to allow Moses tribal descendents penetrate Palestine, if
violence which is evidently crucial to the occupation today as it
was under Saul etc., and if the material consequence of a
financial ambition can also be said to be mirrored by Arabs, their
closest relatives, it becomes of course imperative to you to take
a political stand. And for you to use weapons of knowledge and
example against the Jewish political militancy in evidence
everywhere, from Mossad's secret assignations in distant countries
to the televised present occupation, reels of their violence in
of jewish history itself the field for your engagement in text and
argument is clear and open ground. Something that curiously
enough this protestant history written in 1800’s precisely
pinpoints. This is the fact that tablet, text, history,
psalm and song are an intrinsic part of Jewish history, the
consequence of which associates them with the origins of their
Assyrian background and the parallel of
. Both Jews and Greeks developed the written sign, word, to
encompass other material than mere agricultural and trade records.
They introduced social philosophy, concepts of "the
teacher", the poem, and history which was then called
prophecy. A surge of development toward the future was thus
brought to life. Through Mohammed, later, the Arabs also developed
similar themes, paintings, poems and social philosophy that
ultimately was frustrated by tribal leaders without these concepts
and finally by the English and French mandates and
"kings". I think the Arab has always clung to the
concept of a personal freedom through poetry despite this.
would describe this evolution of mental activity as occurring
because the mind became "indwelling", that was
maintained within a religious "system" exclusive and
militant, which the Wahabbis lacked, having only militancy to
sustain them beyond the Koran. However because of this
exclusive "indwelling" the jews failed to develop a co-ordinating
life-style of vigorous peasant agriculture. They preferred to use
the work of other tribes, as today, having dismissed the thousands
of Palestinian workers, they now use Thais and Chinese etc.
above can easily be found relevant with the development of the
swift and vigorous mental life developed in
. And don't you see how the Romans, Virgil and others fitted
into the understanding that I am emphasising by writing their
books of educational agriculture and poetic myths of Ovid in order
to maintain the contact with nature and natural life.
Academic knowledge accumulated and enabled the protestant cleric
to make an equitable comparison with the Jews as examples of human
development with the Greeks(whom as you know all English worship),
as it was then in the1800s,when there was a growing European surge
of interest in the
misfortune ultimately of the Jews and of the Greeks was in the
latter noticeable in Plato, the association of literacy with
religion, an aristocracy, and with militant victory.
diaspora of the Jews however had an extraordinary and different
development. Armenians developed, (almost global trading!), all
over the surface of
. This trade the jews permeated and finally took over. And this I
suggest is the true source of the energetic enterprise in that
activity; money balance, trade and usury that might almost
now be considered their "genetic" impulse - ?This
trading enabled them make small and useful settlements all over
the place, pleasing to themselves and the foreign nations where
they settled. One such has just been demonstrated in
of ancient establishment - as there was in
where only rwo jews remain (who detest one another!)
I am neglecting to write a little about your essay, instead of my
thoughts on the matter!
plan of your structure for this essay is very interesting and
magnetic, a simple structure of research that allows your profuse
talent to illustrate in your very own style that is so much
admired. But, man dear, in my opinion you have betrayed it and
rushed into it - opening doors here and there for cross currents
of illumination for the dark corners you want to turn out. You
label and even name some of the political criminals you wish to
identify unadvisedly, such as the following: " Sir Conrad
Black...admittedly married to a nasty Jewish suprematist."
and I think you deserve a strong dose of criticism for that for a
start! Another: "for it is not only impossible for you to
join the Jews, it is also not to be desired, for Jewry is not a
good set-up - as we shall try to show.."
manifestations indeed of rule and tradition. The
"reason" for Hitler's support may have been the money he
thought he would have available to prosecute his war in
for the German expansion. Expansion that the weak-minded
Woodrow Wilson thought he was putting to an end with the
Treaty. Some of your allusions and quotations refer to
problems that were not essentially jewish but the problems
citizens all over the world became familiar with : the World
Wars that culminated in the explosions of the Atom Bombs, Problems which
for an outcome outcome demanded that citizens everywhere find
an escape from the hegemony of government tyranny and military
ambitions. Of course this all appeared to recede as
politicians everywhere simply recreated the old formulas for their
governance as today we can see that in Europe, Russia, England and
USA governments are going to corrupt the rule of Law even further
to give them "virtual" control of every citizen. These
politicians have the arrogance to describe their intrusions of
control the "Art of the Possible".
I am not going to work through your essay nit-picking, I think it
is a secure and serious evocation of religious anxieties and certain
fates. The system illustrated by the O.Henry story is an amusing
introduction and instructive to difficult rigours of jewish ideas.
You develop from this threads that hang from the Gordian knot of
this terrible strife. Also your optimism is positively saintly,
although side by side with a deep loathing of the violence and
material philosophies of the modern world.
major objection I have is to this notion of yours that of freedom
as a form of subjection to Zionist projects. I don't think you
have any right to contaminate the innocent human recurrence of the
search for an individual's freedom that has been an ancient
historical and sustained clangour rung out against oppression,
repression and recurring defeat. Such defeats are nothing
whatsoever to do with an overwhelming vision of spiritual
development, despite having been entangled again and again in
religious claims, heresies, and tragedies from
to Joe Soap at war in
is all I can manage to say at the moment, maybe reading it again
sometime I will have other acknowledgement. Regards and thanks for
the opportunity to read your 2004 magnum opus,
Adam, my dear brother in Christ, thanks for the PARDES text. I
read it with great interest and profit. It confirmed me even more
in my mission. What an excellent job you're doing to serve
Truth and He who said "I am the Truth...". It reminds me
of the apocalyptic words: "You must prophecy AGAIN
against many peoples, and nations, languages and kings" (Rev
10,11). That's what we're doing, you in your world and I in mine.
are points I'd like to exchange with you. I was convinced,
and now even more, that honest Jews are the first victims of
Zionism offered on the altar of Baal. Just as honest Christians
and Muslims are victims of their respective clergy. What you say
about Simone Weil changes my opinion favourably about her.
revolution you're doing in the Jewish communities is like the one
I'm doing on my level and possibilities in the Christian
(...or so-called) World. A new apocalyptic priesthood is
actually been formed by Jesus. He is already spiritually back
in the world to renew the relation between his followers and his
Father in a simple family relation. He is to make priests of those
who open the door for Him to come in and have supper together en
"tête à tête" as we say in France (Revelation 1,6 /
3,20 / 5,6/ 20,6/ Luke12,35-40). I'm sure He'd like you to
"open the door and let Him in to have HIS Supper with
you", to share his blessed Body and Blood in simplicity,
not in Churches where He is no more. This is the time of "the
renewal of all things" (Acts 3,21), the "New Jerusalem
descending from Heaven and the New World built up by the One who
sits on the Throne" (Rev 21,1-5). You are more of a christian
priest than any priest or bishop I met. Now is the Lord's
"wedding feast" (Mat 22 / Rev 19,7) now is the time
to answer, and for the "wise virgins to wake up" (Mat
don't think either "that the
of the Church is over". Its sacred
will go on being carried by new modern apostles like a certain
Adam Shamir and others. Had the Church been alive, she would have
spoken like you, like me, and others who dare to speak, and
"Simone Weil, the little Communist Christian saint would
not have avoided full communion with the Church for she felt
the Church to be too pro-Jewish" (I'd even say too pro-zionist.
PaRDeS Chapter 2). You also admit that "The
Church does not wish to confer priesthood upon its laity" (PaRDeS:chapter
"The spiritual Pump"). This is because the Church
is dead. But the living and everlasting Messiah, Jesus, explicitly wishes
to confer his priesthood to laity because we are all priests. This
is one aspect of the New Apocalyptic Earth and Heaven on
earth. That's the reason of my undistructible optimistic faith.
Church is dead because, as mentioned in PaRDeS, chapter 'The
Spiritual Pump': "small agreements with the Jews caused
the submission of Christendom- not only to the Jews, but also to
their Guiding Spirit. It begins (it began already) with
small things...An even worse folly was the idea of two valid
Covenants of Vatican II...In no way may a Christian state
that the Jewish covenant is valid; for it undermines the very
meaning of Christ's sacrifice". This undermining killed the
Church, NOT ITS
. No dialogue with Satan other than a kick in his buttocks. Our
poor "mother" Eve only established an
"innocent" symbolical dialogue with him. She killed
humanity. Christ rescued us. You reveal that Joseph
della Reina only lit an innocent candle at Satan's
command. The Church, through John Paul II, did even more,
much more, She visited the Antichrist up to the Wailing Wall,
In Jerusalem, She even sat on a throne with the Cross of Jesus up
side down, She even received Christ's declared enemy gloriously
in the Vartican, exclaiming heartfully : "God bless
Israel!". I don't see Jesus saying nor doing all that. I
understand why He asked: "When the Son of man comes, will he
find faith on earth?" (Luke 18,8). The Church is morally
dead by becoming
's "zombie". But her holy
will go on and on and on and, as you say ending up PaRDeS :
"After Crucifixion (and death) there is
Resurrection". This has already discretly started in many lay
Christian priests. Whether the traditional Church wants it or not.
God's holy Will be done; It is already being done. My answer
to Jesus' question : "Yes, Brother Lord and Saviour, Yes! You'll
find faith on earth in our welcoming hearts and souls. Our doors
are widely open for You".
be to the everlasting living Jesus, the one and only Christ,
our Lord and Saviour...and to his discreet Holy Mother, our
yours in Jesus, the "semite", our Saviour.
read your manuscript PaRDeS and I am indebted to you for bring out
and expanding on the genesis of the problem the world is
experiencing today. I agree with you that only a very small
percentage of Jews know of the plans drawn by even a smaller
minority of their compatriots.
mention that in the past, until the turn of the 20th
Century a good number of Jews happily assimilated themselves with
the various nations where their wanderings took them and they
became fully fledged French, English, German etc., etc. nationals.
You conclude that the salvation of the world rests with the quick
assimilation of this race.
a Christian you also look as the present struggle as a Good versus
Evil contest for the soul of humanity and place your hopes in the
Christian Church and its principles based on the teachings of Paul
– “there is not Jew or Greek, male or female” – within the
consciousness of Christ.
look at the Jews. Here is a race that has covered the 5 continents
with their presence for thousands of years and despite the claim
of assimilation it did not stop them from being a race. Nowhere
was where they settled this assimilation truly successful. They
did not assimilate with the Egyptians in the time of Moses nor
with the Babylonians in the time of Ezra. They did not assimilate
with the Romans, Greeks, Arabs or the Europeans, and they are not
the span of 2500 years no meaningful change has been noted from
the original prophetic utterance of “a people that dwell
alone”. Isn’t it time we all called it quits?
once heard someone mention the Catholic Church had a saying that
“Give me a child for the first 7 years of his life and he will
always be a Roman Catholic” Jews remain Jews due to two factors
– race (or blood) and ideology (one could also call it Religion)
– and every new born Jew, apart from the ‘blood-tie’ spends
more than seven years in an environment that will indoctrinate him
in “the way of the fathers”Samuel Roth in “Jews Must Live” gives an apt
description of this environment in his “The Bringing Up Of The
Little Jew” chapter. You still call yourself a Jew, although you
were born and brought up in
. It may well explain your quote regarding the locusts not having
or needing a leader.
believe in the concept of Race and its genetic code, in its many
ramifications and in its numerous groups and sub-groups down to
the single individual and accept the differences between
individual units, and these differences increase as one moves up
to sub-groups, groups and eventually to the general trends of a
particular race, where these differences are most noticeable.
Inequality in everything is the norm in Nature, not equality. This
is true also of the human psyche. It is different in every
individual, group and race. And assimilation and interracial
propagation is an aberration of natural principles. It is, in
fact, the true meaning of “adultery” in the Biblical sense.
Church, in its belief that the material world is only a
‘stop-over’, contributed no end to this aberration of Natural
Law in their perceived mission to convert the world to its
ideology. It is still believed that Christ’s second coming will
not take place until the Gospel has been preached to all the
people of the world. While the Church believes in its method of
Salvation through Christ, the Jews believe that their Salvation is
in being Jews. I have no quarrel with either.
White race has buckled under a two-pronged attack.
Jews, as part of their plan to reach the ultimate goal of world
dominance have supplanted the natural instinct of the preservation
of the race and the inequality principle with an ideology of
equality in all spheres of existence, transformed genes into
environment and injected a guilt complex into the blood stream of
Church, with their cry of “mia culpa, mia culpa”, gladly
accepted this ‘guilt trip’ and taught its flock that we are
all guilty of sin and that sin was what made Christ – a Jew –
suffer and die at Calvary. No wonder those that saw Mel’s film
came out of the theatre with a better understanding of how they,
personally, crucified Jesus. (The irony of it all is that the
Bible, and Jesus himself, clearly states that his mission on earth
was for the Jews only) It went further by depicting Jews as the
“chosen ones” who, albeit misguided for now, would eventually
have their names (and their names only) engraved over the 12
portals of the New Jerusalem, built by God in heaven and beamed
down to earth at the end of time. This is the position today. At
the start it tried to differentiate between old and new
(itself) but it was eventually infiltrated with a new ideology and
lost its primary zeal. It was bound to happen for it used the Old
Testament to formulate its doctrines.
Bible is, in my view, a Jewish book – from Genesis to Revelation
- that concerns itself primarily (‘overwhelmingly’, I should
say) with Jewish fortunes and all other nations are treated as
side items, whose people may get some of the crumbs that fall from
the Master’s table. The New Testament was produced to, perhaps,
counteract the Old but in trying to prove their point by using thefulfilment of prophecy as their ‘proof ‘ the writers
tied the Old to the New in a way that cannot easily be undone.
Thus the acceptance that both parts formed a whole, indivisible,
and this is further endorsed with the stamp of ‘holiness’.
matters little if one spiritualises the stories presented or if
one accepts them as historical facts. And it matter even less if
one is to marry both. Then one gets a myriad of interpretations
and beliefs as is the case today.
accept Hitler’s interpretation of National Socialism. A State is
a racial organism. One is a member of that State by the virtue
that your psyche and your blood is German, from German parents and
carries the genetic code of that particular sub-group. Place of
birth, religious belief and group association does not make one a
German, neither does one loose one’s ‘Germaniness’ through
these factors. The same goes for any other people. A Chinese does
not alter his features because he/she was born in
He may became fully Europeanised but he remains a Chinese.
point you bring out in connection with the destruction of
during WWII that it was due to National Socialist policies is, to
me, not valid. War came because the Jews wanted it for they saw
National Socialism as a threat to their own plans, and the
Holocaust myth gave a tremendous impetus to their cult of
‘victimhood’ and helped their cause, no end.
history, and before, men and nations always had the desire to rule
others – it seems it is a human trait – so there is no
‘sin’ in the Jews wanting to control the rest of the peoples
in the world. Some conquerors are magnanimous, others tyrannical.
From what you describe the Jews fall in the latter category.
Still, borders were not drawn by God on a world map so man is
under no obligation to maintain them
understand that nobody can change somebody else unless that
someone is willing to change, thus I admire the Jews for remaining
Jews and in their endeavours to reach the goal they were
‘promised’ so long ago and reserve my utter contempt to my
so-called leaders who were elected to the task of ensuring my
independence and well-being. They are the traitors and criminals.
And the ‘shabbesgoyim’ fall in this same category.
I cannot see myself including Ariel
in this list. He and the Jews believe that the end justifies the
means, albeit with some self sacrifices, and are prepared to allow
some Jews to perish for the greater good of the race. And to
counteract their racial ideology only a similar ideology has any
chance of success. If the nations of the world adopted similar
trends in their respective lands it would lead to equilibrium.
see no need for a belief in a higher plane as a fundamental
requirement for people. I believe that Hitler sought to replace
the Judeo-Christian religion with a ‘Nature’ religion which he
referred to as “Fate” and having spoken to some Germans,
Hungarians and Italians (those not too scared to talk), that lived
through those days, it seems they look at that period as a Golden
Era of Central Europe. In fact, I spoke to British veterans that
said that ‘if they knew then what they know now’ they would
have fought on the German side.
read “Mein Kampf” I can honestly say that I find no fault in
the book, taking into consideration the period in which it was
look at this letter as my own interpretation of events and not as
a critique of your most excellently formulated manuscript. I hope
you forgive its length. .
am puzzled, though, seeing that you live in Israel, that you have
been allowed to remain, so far, relatively untouched by the powers
that be and able to write what you write on a subject that seems
to be taboo in the Western nations. May you be allowed to
continue, as the world needs people such as yourself.
I have read the first three parts of Pardes.
My opinion is that it is absolutely perfect.
And purely marxist as far as I understand.
I want to check this point with a few marxist experts, sooner or
will have to make a choice.