David Irving was sent to jail for denying Jewish superiority.
His doom seals the reign of freedom that began with the fall of
For Whom The Bell Tolls
By Israel Shamir
“Do not ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls
for thee,” said the English poet, John Donne. A shameful
Austrian verdict bodes ill not only for the English historian
David Irving (sentenced to three years of gaol) but for our
freedom as well. Never has our feeling of justice been insulted
like this! When an occasional dissident was jailed in Brezhnev’s
Russia or Ne Win’s Burma, there was always an uproar of protest.
Now the only response to the Irving verdict is stunned silence.
When they sent innocent Muslims to the living hell of Guantanamo,
we could think: they are people of the Third World -- different
rules apply. A Batista policeman in Graham Greene’s Our Man
in Havana had said: some people can be tortured, and some
can not. When Ernst Zundel was kidnapped in the US and brought
to trial in Germany, we could think: it is a German internal
affair. Now an eminent man of letters, an author of widely read
and acclaimed books, a recognized European figure was snatched
from a civilised country and jailed for irreverence to the Jews.
Technically, David Irving was sentenced for
so-called “holocaust denial”. But the concept of Jewish
holocaust being the only enforced dogma of supposedly secular
Europe has little to do with the Second World War and its
atrocities. It has everything to do with the Jewish claim of
superiority and exclusivity. There is a Jewish prayer saying:
“Bless you, Lord, that you created me a Jew, that you separated
between Jews and the earth folks, like you separated between the
Holy and Profane, that our fate is not like their fate”. The
Holocaust concept is just another form of this prayer. They say
that even their death is not like the death of anybody else. We
must deny the concept of Holocaust without doubt and
hesitation, even if every story of Holocaust down to the most
fantastic invention of Wiesel were absolutely true. Therefore
the technical discussions of Jewish mortality are perfectly
legitimate but superfluous, like the argument whether a whale
could swallow Jonah is superfluous for an atheist.
The legal enforcers of the Holocaust want us
to bow down to the idol of Jewish superiority, or else! They
Deborah Lipstadt for denial of the
Holocaust of Dresden, or Guenter Lewy who penned a lengthy
Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide? denying the
genocide of native Americans. The Jews produced and published
these denials for the same reason they published the Satanic
Pictures - in order to emphasise the difference between a goy
and a Jew. They want you to remember: you may profane Islam and
Christianity, but not Judaism. You may discount the suffering of
anybody but the Jews.
Thus we should say: David Irving was
sentenced for denial of Jewish superiority. His doom seals the
reign of (albeit limited) freedom that began with the fall of
Bastille. European history went full circle: from rejecting the
rule of Church and embracing free thought, to the new Jewish
mind-control on a world scale. Not only is Western Christian
civilisation dead, but even its successor, secular European
civilisation, has met its demise only a few days after its proud
and last celebration by the Danish scribes. It was short-lived:
about two hundred years from beginning to the end, the Europeans
may once have had the illusion that they can live without an
ideological supremacy. Now this illusion is over; and the Jews
came in the stead of the old and tired See of St Peter to rule
over the minds and souls of Europeans.
In 1962, Look magazine invited founder
of the Jewish state David
Ben-Gurion to picture the world 25 years into the future. He
predicted that World Government would already be in place by
1987, with the Supreme Court for Mankind (the higher
ecclesiastic body) would be established in Jerusalem, along with
a shrine there commemorating the Jewish role in the
bringing-together of mankind. He was mistaken by only a few
years. The world is not fully subdued yet, but it already knows
its new master.
In the 19th century, Europeans
could not fully colonise China. But there was an obvious mark of
their supremacy: the Settlement System. It divided the residents
of China into two categories: the supreme human beings (the
Europeans) and the lowly natives. A native who raised his hand
against a superior European was tried by European colonial law,
a European whose misdeed caused harm to a native was out of
bounds of native justice. This system of “settlements” was
dismantled by Chairman Mao after the Communist victory of 1949.
Similar systems of colonial justice went down with the colonial
empires that employed them, and for a short while afterwards,
every country was sovereign over its land.
Some time ago, the Knesset of the Jewish
State revived the Settlement System for the
non-yet-fully-colonised world: an offender against the Jews,
wherever he lives, wherever he commits his offence, can be
brought to the Jewish court. The offended Jew may have no
connection whatsoever to the Jewish State, the offence may be
not considered an offence by the local native law, but he still
can be brought to Jewish justice in Jerusalem. This law claimed
supreme sovereignty of the Jews over the rest of mankind. This
law denied the sovereignty of all nations save one. Such a claim
had to be treated as any hostile attempt of the nation’s
sovereignty: as an act of war. But it passed in silence due to a
marvellous Jewish invention: gradualness.
This method was explained by Amira Hass, the
Haaretz correspondent in colonised Palestine. She
wrote: “If you throw a frog into boiling water, it will jump
out and save its life. But a frog swimming in room temperature
water that is gradually heated will grow used to the heat; by
the time the water boils, it's too late and the frog dies. In
the development of the Israeli system of control over the
Palestinian people and their land, the Israeli occupation has
raised to the level of genius the use of gradualness as a means
of making people grow used to something.” This gradualness was
used by the Jews – not only in regard to the Palestinians.
The Settlement System started small: the
Long Arm of the Jews snatched Adolf Eichmann in Argentina and
brought him to Jewish justice in Jerusalem. Adolf Eichmann was
a bad guy who did a lot of harm to Jews in a big way, so many
countries chose to disregard this grievous infringement of
Argentine sovereignty. And it was just the beginning:
A few years later, the Polish court demanded
the extradition of a Jewish mass murderer, Solomon Morel. This
Morel tortured and killed with his own hands hundreds of ethnic
Germans in a concentration camp in postwar Poland.
His crimes were exposed by the late American journalist John
Sack. Morel escaped to Tel Aviv, and the Jewish state replied to
the Polish demand with imperial haughtiness: “What Chutzpah!
These natives do not know their place!” Probably, Queen
Victoria would reply like that if a native African chief were to
demand the surrender of one of her officials to his justice.
Since then, every country, big and small, has
accepted the notion of the Jews being above the law. The
wealthy Russian Jewish crook Nevzlin escaped Russia and lives
peacefully in Tel Aviv, next to Flatto-Sharon, a French-Jewish
crook, not far from a murderer of a Canadian child, within a
reach from many other killers and crooks. A powerful Jewish
organisation called Khabad wrote in its charter: there should be
no Jews in goys’ jails. By bribes and persuasion they release
Jewish criminals from jails and ship them to the Jewish state.
The Khabad founder, Lubawitsch Rebbe’s birthday is celebrated as
a holiday, “Education Day,” in the USA.
In property cases Jews are also above the
law. Jewish property is sacrosanct. They have demanded and
received back all property that once belonged to Jews in
Germany, Austria, France, Baltic states. If a Jew had no heirs,
his property went to World Jewry. But 90% of goys’ property was
confiscated by the Jewish state in 1948, and since then 50% of
the lands conquered in 1967. Even last year thousands of dunams
of goys’ lands were taken over in Jerusalem area, for a goy has
no real title to property, according to Jewish law.
A taste of Jewish justice is provided in the
case of an Israeli captain who murdered a schoolgirl, 13, in
full sight of his soldiers. He emptied his gun unto her body and
was found not guilty by the Jewish court. Actually, none of
the non-Jewish children’ murderers (two hundred in the last
three years) was ever punished by a Jewish court. Not many of
them were even brought to justice, but whoever was got off
lightly. The settler Nachum Korman murdered a 10-year-old boy,
Hilmi Shusha, in the village of Hussan. He was apprehended,
taken to the court and forensic evidence against him was brought
by the highest Israeli forensic institution, but the judge
dismissed the evidence and sentenced the murderer to six months
of social work. On mere suspicion of having committed such a
crime against a Jewish child, a goy gets a life sentence.
Jewish justice makes us look back at the
Inquisition trials with some nostalgia. When Galileo repented,
he was allowed to continue his studies unhindered. The
repentance of Irving did not help him a bit. The judge said:
“The regret he showed was considered to be mere lip service to
the law.” And “independent expert” Dina Porat, head of Tel Aviv
University's Institute for the Study of Contemporary
Anti-Semitism and Racism,
said that “Irving's purported repentance is motivated by his
fear of a verdict that could amount to 10 years' imprisonment.”
Now, Jewish justice is being enforced on a
global scale. The European Jewish Congress is set
to file a complaint in the International Criminal Court
(ICC) in The Hague against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
for “incitement to genocide”, but all attempts to bring Ariel
Sharon to justice predictably failed. The greater Jewish state,
the US, also adopted its smaller sister’s idea of unlimited
supreme sovereignty. An offence against an American citizen can
be brought to an American court wherever it occurred.
Surprisingly, this Imperial claim, akin to the Settlement system
of old, was also utilised mainly in the Jewish interests.
Whenever Jewish settlers -- American citizens -- were killed in
the course of the Middle Eastern conflict, American judges ruled
against the Palestinian National Authority, Iran, Hamas and the
whole world, and granted the victims’ survivors multimillion
dollar damages. But nobody can sue the Jews: whether they kill
Rachel Corrie, the American peace activist, with a bulldozer in
Gaza, or they strafe American sailors on board USS Liberty or
kill and maim American Palestinians.
With the Austrian verdict, Jewish supremacy
ceased to be a paranoid’s nightmare, and became a fact bound in
law, like the Viking supremacy in Danelaw, in East Anglia of
old, with this one difference: the Jewish supremacy has
religious overtones while the Vikings relied upon their swords
and their dogs.
This is openly discussed in the Jewish world.
“We live in the full blossom of Messiah Days, free from our
political adversaries and soon to be freed from the satanic
goys”, Uriel Tal wrote.
While Christians believe that the Second Coming of Christ will
usher a completely new world of miracles, the Jewish view
expressed by Maimonides is that the world in the Days of Messiah
will not differ much from the world we knew, except for triumph
of Jewish supremacy, Gedulath Israel (Hilchoth Teshuva
9:2). Based on this understanding, the Sanhedrin, the Jewish
supreme religious court, was established a year ago to judge the
world. It is
led by Rabbi Adin Steinzaltz, and the goyim who observe the
made their obeisance to him.
Some months ago I was brought to the police
station in my Jaffa and asked to answer the complaint of the
French Jewish organisation, LICRA.
“Did you write about
Jewish supremacy and world dominion?” a policeman asked.
“So what if I did?” I
replied. “Every second Rabbi has expressed this view.”
“Yes, but they see it
in a positive light!” said the policeman.
Thus there is no argument about the fact of
Jewish supremacy, only about its assessment. If you think it is
good, you may even be a US president -- if you think it is bad,
your place is in jail! Meanwhile, Jewish supremacy is hard on
those who challenge it as Irving did. Gradually -- oh ever so
gradually, so as not to frighten the frog from heating water --
the screw will tighten.
Eventually it may become unpleasant: Jewish
justice can give a handsome handicap to its nearest competitor
in ruthlessness, Genghis Khan. It is partial, and proud of it.
By Jewish law, a Jew vs. a Goy is always right, even if he is
wrong. The Europeans will feel the tender mercy of the Jews,
until now the exclusive privilege of Palestinians. There may
well be poetic justice in this turn of events.
Ordinary Jews aren’t going to enjoy the
new-old order of things. If there is something Jewish justice
likes even less than a goy, it’s a stray Jew. Apostates, that is
Jews who turned to Christ, should be killed, according to
Maimonides. The extremely clement Rabbi Asher tore off the noses
of Jewish women who had intercourse with a goy, while Jewish men
were normally flogged for this transgression. Well, some
obligations coming with superior status.
Christianity will probably dwindle; only its
Jew-worshipping sects, similar to the US Christian Zionists,
will survive. Others will be prosecuted for their antisemitism
and will be disbanded. The churches will be destroyed, in
accordance with the Jewish commandment. They should not be
allowed to compete with the Temple in Jerusalem which will be
rebuilt on the ruins of the al Aqsa Mosque. The rebuilding will
be quite painless: after the forthcoming attack on Iran, Muslims
will have other things to worry about -- for instance, their
physical survival! This can’t be guaranteed, as they were
proclaimed “Amalek”, and their mass annihilation is a religious
duty of the Jews. The road to this future is opened by the
fateful ruling of the Austrians.
Always looking for the bright side of things:
now the Europeans do not have to worry about the dark prophecy
of the Protocols. The rule of the Elders of Zion is already upon
us, and egad! -- it is not half as bad as we feared. At least,
Haaretz, 26 September 1984