In the art of surveillance, there is a cunning ploy
familiar to the readers of Le Carre: the target is followed by a clumsy
gumshoe; he discovers he is being tailed,
easily shakes the tail off and goes on, feeling secure and unobserved.
Unbeknownst to him, there are other detectives who stick to him like
glue and follow him to his perdition. Professionally it is called a
“double tail”.
Apparently, some of us were duped by such a ruse in
the peculiar affair of a Zionist plot to infiltrate Wikipedia. This
powerful online encyclopaedia is ostensibly free and open: everyone can
be an editor, can add or edit any entry. Editors remain anonymous; their
true identity is hidden behind a nickname. This rule has a serious
drawback: using this anonymity, a dedicated group can infiltrate the
system by stealth, distort reality and create a false picture of the
world in the eyes of billions. Apparently this script has been recently
enacted.
Conspiracy? Yes. Jewish conspiracy? You bet! The
damning email exchange was intercepted and
published, revealing a radical Zionist plot to bend “Wiki.” A
moderate leftist (some would call it ‘tame’) US-based pro-Palestinian
site
EI revealed that the radical-extremist Zionist organisation CAMERA
called for “volunteers who can work as ‘editors’ to ensure” that
Israel-related articles on Wikipedia agree with their right-wing-Zionist
agenda. This effort was to be kept secret from the media and the public.
Stealth and misrepresentation were presented as the keys to success. A
CAMERA official advised the volunteers to sign up as editors for
Wikipedia and afterwards to avoid editing Israel-related material for a
while, in order to “avoid the appearance of being one-topic editors”.
The orchestrated effort was to appear as if it were the work of
unaffiliated individuals, and for this reason the editors were to avoid
picking a user name that marked them as pro-Israel, or that let people
know their real name. The emails taught Zionist apprentices how to act
in the interests of Israel while using neutral language. The emphasis
was on the long-run side of the operation: “This is a marathon not a
sprint”, a Zionist instructor nicknamed ‘Zeq’ taught his apprentices in
the email exchange.
The EI article about this revelation was quite
sycophantic towards Wikipedia. It presented “Wiki” as an objective
source at loggerheads with Zionist infiltrators, and even bordered on
advertising: “Openness and good faith are among Wikipedia’s core
principles. Any person in the world can write or edit articles, but
Wikipedia has strict guidelines and procedures for accountability
intended to ensure quality control and prevent vandalism, plagiarism or
distortion. It is because of these safeguards that articles on key
elements of the Palestine-Israel conflict have generally remained
well-referenced, useful and objective.”
Still, it was not enough, and on the following day,
22 April 2008, EI updated this article with a triumphal and
calming statement: “a plan by the pro-Israel pressure group CAMERA to
skew Wikipedia in a pro-Israel direction appears to have collapsed after
it was exposed by EI”. Zeq was dismissed, and anyway, fewer than
a dozen of CAMERA moles were active at the time EI exposed the scheme.
In short: everything is fine, Wiki is functioning well, and the Zionist
scare is gone, thanks to fearless EI. And anyway, it was only a
small operation by the enemies of freedom, and it is over.
Excuse me, is this an article, or a paid
advertisement for Wikipedia? Did EI receive on the evening of
April 21st an offer they could not refuse from the owner of Wiki? Only a
Zionist can think that Wiki “articles on key elements of the
Palestine-Israel conflict have generally remained well-referenced,
useful and objective.” On the contrary, they are biased in the extreme;
just read, for instance, the exceedingly hostile entry on Hamas,
including its Talk, i.e. discussions of editors, deletions and
corrections. It defines Hamas as “… best known for multiple suicide
bombings and other attacks directed against civilians [best known to
whom? To me it is best known as the ruling party of Palestine, and
secondly, as a grassroots mutual assistance movement – ISH]… Hamas'
charter calls for the destruction of the State of Israel [while all
prominent Israeli parties have joined in the destruction of Palestine –
ISH] … the organization is described by many as antisemitic.” Is that
objective? Further the entry says, inter alia: “Hamas is
considered by the US a terrorist organisation.” This is true, but not
the whole truth. I personally added: “However, Russia refused to
consider Hamas a terrorist organisation.” My addition was immediately
removed by the ever-watchful Zionist case-officer. Hamas is terrorist,
full stop.
Only a dishonest fool, or someone who never used
Wikipedia, could think that plan of the Lobby “to skew Wikipedia in a
pro-Israel direction appears to have collapsed”. The clumsy gumshoe was
shaken off, for CAMERA is but a bunch of amateurs, extreme Jewish
nationalists with some nuisance value. They do not represent the Jewish
mainstream; but they do play a useful part: they make the mainstream
appear moderate. Being hassled by CAMERA is like
being hassled by the Klan – it proves nothing. They hassle everybody, even moderate Zionists and
other fellow-philosemites whom CAMERA fanatics consider insufficiently
zealous, such as
Johann Hari, an English professional philosemite who recently
boasted: “I have worked undercover at both the
Finsbury Park mosque and among neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers to expose the
Jew-hatred there; I went on the Islam Channel to challenge the
anti-Semitism of Islamists, I received a rash of death threats calling
me ‘a Jew-lover’’. Later he strayed farther afield and wrote about
Israeli sewage pouring all over Gaza. Afterwards, he complained, “CAMERA
said I am an anti-Jewish bigot akin to Joseph Goebbels.”
Now, when the amateurs are disgraced and gone, the
professionals remain. Wiki is as partial to Jews as the Jewish
Chronicle. The picture of the world it offers is being edited and
shaped in full accordance with the general Jewish world view thanks to a
group of permanent and devoted editors and arbiters.
Freedom to add and edit is just the bait attracting
millions of unpaid contributors. If Wiki were truly free, provided that
“ordinary people’ are in the vast majority, we could expect to find a
democratic world view presented, not one not perverted by a biased
minority; but the real Wikipedia does not work that way. The apparent
chaos of Wiki is strictly controlled by a hierarchy of Agents Smith, who
secure the Wiki matrix. They delete references to Jewish misdeeds, but
emphasize every good deed by a Jew. Israel/Palestine is just one area in
what is truly universal agenda. For instance, they block and remove
attempts to mention the Jewish origin of the founder of the Satanist
movement, one La Vey (originally Levy), though this explains his hatred
towards Christianity. They insist on the inferiority of Poincare versus
Einstein, of Jung versus Freud or Proudhon versus Marx. Every act
against Jews is recorded; every act of Jews against goyim is blotted out
from this organised memory of our generation. These editors can manage
just fine, thank you very much, without amateur infiltrators.
Zeq has been banned for his indiscretions, but the
man he wrote of so admiringly, whom he described as a role model to his
apprentices (“work with him and learn from him”), an ideal,. effective
Zionist Wikipedia editor called Jayjg, is still there. Jayjg is not just
an editor; he is an arbiter -- what passes for a judge on the Wikipedia.
He was appointed to that position by the site owner himself. He is an
Agent Smith of the Wiki matrix. One can see his work in many, many
entries: clever and unscrupulous, he is a master of the subterfuge and
deceit.
Another, superior Agent Smith is Cberlet or John
Foster (Chip) Berlet, the scourge of the web. He is
acting under many names. He is a collaborator with the ADL, the
Jewish thought police. Though he previously denied having any
relationship to ADL, he admitted to Israeli Foreign Affairs that
he “had had quite a cordial professional relationship with the ADL" and
“had been doing research in cooperation with ADL”. The New York City
Jewish newspaper "Forward" reported that Berlet transferred information
from an FBI anti-Communist informer directly to ADL.
Ace Hayes wrote: “John Foster “Chip” Berlet has been involved, over
the past half decade, in attacking virtually every independent critic of
the Imperial State that the reader can name.” His operation is financed
by the
Ford Foundation. Michael Collins Piper in his monumental book on the
Kennedy assassination, Final Judgment, asserted that Chip Berlet
is a CIA agent. Naturally, his own entry in Wiki is protected from
editing. The Arbitration committee (those who hold the reigns of power
on the Wiki) “admit to hero-worship of Cberlet’, I was informed by a
prominent insider.
These men are discreet, they won’t babble about their
devotion to the Jewish cause -- they hide it under the veil of
bureaucratic expressions and abbreviations. Their supporting cast
includes some Jewish “antizionists” like RolandR. This is actually
British Trotskyite trade union apparatchik Roland Rance, who does not
mind cooperating with convinced anti-Communist, CIA and ADL agent Berlet
and with zealous Zionist Jayjg. So much for his antizionism and his
socialism! He, and thousands of smaller wannabe Agents Smith do not need
the starry-eyed arch-Zionists of CAMERA, they are already in.
The “revelation” by EI is nothing but a
subterfuge, a “double tail” executed to increase our trust in Wiki. A
similar “double tail” operation was performed last year, when Wiki
announced it had found CIA-made edits on a few pages. Careful
reading of that “revelation” was even more disappointing than that of
EI. The worst discovered CIA edit of the President Ahmadinejad entry
was an ‘added exclamation “Wahhhhhh!”, while “other changes that have
been made are more innocuous, and include tweaks to the profile of
former CIA chief Porter Goss and celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey.”
This is ridiculous: the US secret services spend many billions per annum
in their drive for domination of the Web. A recent
report speaks of $30 billion allocated by the Pentagon for an
“electronic Manhattan Project” in order to fight the Web. And they want
us to believe that all these billions produced an exclamation “Wahhhhhh!”?
Alas, it is just another “double tail” sting operation by the usual
suspects.
2
The Wiki entries on Palestine/Israel are far from
“well-referenced, useful and objective” as the dupes of EI claim.
On the second thought, are they dupes, or willing collaborators? The top
man in EI is Electronic Ali, as Ali Abunima is nicknamed,
the man who began the witch hunt against “Shamir the antisemite”. He is
the Arab front for various exclusively Jewish organisations for
Palestine, who rather promote the Jewish cause and fight antisemitism.
Such Jewish bodies like to have a compliant shabbesgoy (as Rosa
Luxemburg called these guys) for a front, and Ali fits the bill
perfectly. Even this article on Wiki makes some reference to ‘evil
antisemites’.
In his attack on me, Electronic Ali acted together
with the execrable Hussein Ibish, but since then, the thieves have
fallen apart.[i]
Another prominent EI person is, or was, Nigel Parry, a
British antisemitism-fighter, their webmaster and probably also their
case officer. Nigel Perry is an enforcer of Political Correctness
and is Gatekeeper General of the permitted discourse on Palestine,
keeping the line between hard Likud and the soft Peace Now. He proudly
mentions many years of involvement with the Palestinian cause. Well,
such guys are a good reason why the Palestinian cause looks the way it
does.
Why, we could have One State, a single unified state
in Israel/Palestine by now, but for these guys! Looking back, that was a
possible development in 2001, sometime before 9/11, when my call for One
State was heeded by many Israelis and Americans, and supported by major
American newspapers. But then these men began their campaign to
denigrate me and scared supporters away. “Shamir is discredited and
marginalised”, they wrote with satisfaction. For them, it did not matter
that together with me, they discredited and marginalised the idea of One
State, the only possible peaceful solution to our conflict.
The final battle was fought on the Wikipedia site,
where Ali-Ibish-Parry provided ammunition to Zionist Agent Smith Jayjg
and ADL’s own Berlet, with the ADL-sponsored block of “antifascist”
e-zines: British Searchlight, Norwegian Monitor, Swedish
Expo, American Trotskyite Socialist Viewpoint et al. These
formidable forces were counteracted by our wonderful friend Joh Domingo,
a South African fighter against apartheid, and our French friend
Omnivore. You can read the protocols of the battle on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Israel_Shamir. They decided to
make me a Swedish neonazi impostor, instead of the Israeli writer I
really am.
All the time this battle was going on, I lived in my
Jaffa house, receiving endless visitors, giving numerous interviews,
going to work, seeing people – but I might as well have been dead. I
felt like Doc Daneeka, a character in Joseph Heller’s witty Catch-22,
who was declared dead as the plane he was supposed to fly was downed. “I
am alive!” he shouted. “Here we have a paper saying you are dead”, they
replied. His wife “inherited” his property, he was stricken from the
lists, they stopped serving him food, and even his friends and comrades
looked askance when he appeared. This is the power of an
official-looking document – or a webpage blue with hyperlinks. Thus I
have learned the dreadful power of an encyclopaedia: it does not reflect
the world, but rather creates the world. Wiki is linked to thousands of
sites; whether you look at answers.com or at an Arab English-language
site, you’ll be led to Wiki with its lies.
If an encyclopaedia says I am a Swedish neonazi
antisemite, nothing can change it. I could scream all day long: “Look,
here I am, in Jaffa” but they would reply: “Here we have an official
paper saying that you are not”. I am very grateful to Joh Domingo for
his superhuman efforts, but he could not overcome the Agents Smith.
Neither could I. If tomorrow they decide to make you a little green man
from Mars, they will succeed, too. And then, even your friends will look
behind your back for your flying saucer.
A few days ago, I spoke to a group of Indian
intellectuals in Delhi, and afterwards I received this touching letter
from Come Carpentier, a French expat writer living in the Indian
capital. He wrote: “I meant to thank you for these enlightening,
balanced and always objective yet passionate words you spoke that
evening...Listening to them dispels even better than reading you the
reputation that you have been given by you-know-who as a firebrand
defamer of Israel, holocaust denier, Nazi apologist and so on and so
forth... Not to mention the rumours about your being a clandestine
Swedish Far Right-winger infiltrated in the Holy Land by
the international Islamo-Fascist Cabal!”
III
In a way, the pro-Jewish bias of Wiki is unavoidable
bearing in mind Jewish positions in Western discourse, media and
universities. Jews – even people of Jewish origin – are likely to
correct discourse in a way that is flattering for them. They did it
hundred years ago, they did it five hundred years ago. Provided they do
it in only one direction, they constitute the only entity (besides the
undermined Church and its Orders) capable of a marathon (in words of
Zeq) -- capable of sustaining a long-run operation.
A hundred years ago, New York lawyer Samuel
Untermeyer financed the first Scofield Reference Bible; since then, the
Scofield Bibles are being republished in newer even more pro-Jewish
editions and they bring in millions of Christian Zionists.
Joachim Martillo writes in his
Judonia: “Jewish efforts benefit from organizational memory that
does not exist in other lobbying situations. The longevity of Jewish
Federation organizations can give Israel Lobbying efforts a generational
aspect not seen elsewhere. For example, Israel Advocacy organizations
worked for fifty years to delegitimize Arabists in the Foreign Service
and State Department, and replace them with Israel-sympathetic
personnel”.
Martillo erroneously connects this result with some
specific pro-Israel organisation. The success of Zionism (and
incidentally its crimes) is just the strawberry on top of the Jewish
success cake. The Jews are engaged in the advocacy of Jews, and
consequently they delegitimize Arabists, or priests, or independent
historians who do not subscribe to the notion that Jews are special in a
consistently beneficial way. Zionism is a result of Jewish pruning of
history, and this pruned history is what we are all taught.
There are no Arab sheiks or Russian oligarchs or
American oilmen ready to finance anything long-term of no immediate
relevancy. They do not understand that practically every entry of an
encyclopaedia, of every textbook, influences future generations. A
correct entry on, say, Poincare or monotheism or the Persian invasion
could save potential Zionists from their delusions of grandeur.
Wikipedia is a great idea for Jews: people of all
nations from all over the world contribute their knowledge, and then
this Summa is pruned in a way acceptable to the pro-Jewish gardeners.
Despite its “free” image, Wikipedia is part and parcel of the immense
Judaised media holding, and thus is as biased as any other publication
of this group, from the New York Times (owned by Sulzberger) to
Liberation (owned by Rothschild) to hundreds of Murdock papers.
Conclusion
Wikipedia is an important asset, like the New York
Times, but both are in the hands of enemies of freedom. Sometimes
good and truthful articles or entries are to be found in both, but these
are specks of gold dust placed there to salt a dud mine. We certainly
want to democratise both -- to make both really democratic and
accessible. Until this is done, we should explain that both are tools of
mind control not to be trusted or taken at face value. If Wiki wants to
preserve some of its reliability, it must get rid of its Zionist
enforcers. Not only of the CAMERA bumpkins, but of the hard men in black
suits, the Agents Smith.
Responses of readers:
From Colonel Maguire, Mississippi
Dear Swedish Neo-Nazi Imposter,
Excellent article for the uninformed masses. I saw
the original breathless 'expose' earlier. Naturally I interpreted it as
merely a Zionist Likudnik plot to overturn Wiki's existing Zionist
Laborite control. No more significant than Israeli elections.
This event: "A hundred years ago, a New York
lawyer Samuel Untermeyer financed the first Scofield Reference Bible;
since then, the Scofield Bibles are being republished in newer even more
pro-Jewish editions and they bring in millions of Christian Zionists."
deserves more attention and better investigative
journalism than it has received to date. I think Untermeyer himself
only played a partial role in this by supporting Scofield during his
period of editing, or rather Talmudicizing, the KJV Bible. When we look
at everything, Untermeyer's own role reduces to local NYC Zionist
cashier.
1. Scofield's own background. No known divinity
school training to justify his T.h.d. No known ability in Hebrew,
Aramaic or Greek. Convicted forger and swindler, notorious adulterer,
wife abandoner and 'deadbeat dad'. iow, the perfect shabbas goy
profile.
2. Place of authorship: Scofield went on sabbatical
to Switzerland, of all places, to 'complete' his work. You and I know
this as a hotbed of Jewish subversives of all kinds prior to WWI.
Bolsheviks, Zionists, Rothschilds...
3. First publisher. Oxford University Press, 1909.
And revised in 1917 in the Year of the Balfour Declaration. This
particular transaction is very curious, especially given Scofield's own
known notorious personal history. Nor has the august Oxford University
Press felt any need to rescind its imprimatur despite widespread
knowledge of Scofield's infamous personal and professional life.
I personally rank Scofield's sulpherous book as
second only to "The Holocaust" (TM) in its political importance for
intellectually and morally justifying Zionism among Christians.
Regards,
Maguire
From World View News, Boston
Dear Israel, Don't be too harsh on old Ali. Can you
blame him for mistrusting an Israeli?
Those were the good old days; you used to be a rebellious Jew and one of
the elite. But
alas, now you are a lowly Christian like everyone else. The Arabs only
talk to Jews.
From Henry Kopke, Canada
Hello Israel Adam,
This comes from Canada:
I like the stories being sent by "that little green man from Mars" and I
appreciate seeing and reading his views on the world we live in. I
approve of his "swedish-russian-jewish-orthodox-anti-semitic or
whatever" interpretation of politics and agree with his views on the
treatment of the Palestinians by Israel. I just wish that there were
more such intelligent and straight thinking people in this world.
Keep up the good work!
[i] In an
article by Osamah Khalil of Berkeley EI deservedly
took Ibish to task for his “defense of Abbas’ strategy of
deference and obsequiousness to the US and Israel. According to
Ibish’s issue paper, Abbas’ problem is not that he is a failed,
corrupt and ineffectual leader who appears to Palestinians as an
eager American tool, but that he is “uninspiring” and “lacks the
charisma that many politicians rely upon, and is not an emotive
speaker.” Ibish’s screed, continues EI, “deliberately ignores a
thugocracy in Palestinian politics as embodied by Mohammad
Dahlan, Jibril Rajoub and their ilk.” His idea of an independent
secular Palestinian state is a US-backed government of thieves
and their enforcers… Ibish derides reconciliation between Fatah
and Hamas as “utopian”, as for him there is no alternative to
Abbas’ rule, American hyperpower, and Israel’s military and
economic dominance in the Middle East.”