Scorpion Logic
By Israel Shamir
The Arctic cold spell that has frozen Palestine for a few
weeks apparently departed with President Bush, leaving us to ponder why this
strange man came here at all. Some incorrigible optimists expressed belief that
Bush had called the Annapolis conference and departed on his present journey in
order to achieve peace in the Middle East and to improve his image for future
generations. “He does not want to retire with the blemish of Abu Ghraib and the
Iraqi war, he dreams of being well remembered”, they say. The same optimists
used to say the same things about General Sharon during his much publicised
withdrawal from Gaza. It took a year or two for even the dumbest optimists to
understand that (as we
wrote in real time during the withdrawal) this act allowed the Jews to
inflict more suffering on Palestinians and at a cheaper price. Now they can bomb
Gaza at ease, without worrying about the stray Jew who might be hit as well. Now
they can starve Gaza and make billions by selling their goods to the besieged
while the price tab is
paid by international community. That was Sharon’s nature: if he’d give you
a piece of bread, look for a needle in it; if he’d give you a glass of water,
check it for poison. Like the scorpion in
the Middle Eastern tale, he could not behave differently. Bush is an
American twin of his vegetable friend Sharon who is now stuck in a comatose
limbo reacting to pain. These guys simply can’t do good. If you see Bush doing a
good deed, run to the optician! Our friend Jack Graham wrote recently that
America is not the Great Satan. True, but under Bush, it will fill the bill
until the real Satan comes along.
A psychologist might try to unravel the mystery of Bush’s
deep connection with the Neocons -- we won’t go into his motives (Is he
zombified? Blackmailed? Bewitched?), we’ll just accept it as a fact. For Neocons,
Israel/Palestine is the most important core issue. But they are not satisfied
with full control over Palestine; whatever it is they conspire towards requires
securing the entire East from India to Ethiopia. They will come back to deal
with Palestinians later, when the rest is secured. Now they wreak havoc and let
slip the dogs of war to run free. They intend to undo Pakistan and seize its
nuclear assets, they want to bring Russia and China under control, but their
immediate desire is to subdue Iran. For this purpose, Bush needs some Arab
stooges standing by. The Masters of Discourse claim that the Arabs “are
trembling with fear of the alleged 'nuclear ambitions' of Iran and might even be
willing to sell out the Palestinian people if the United States were to 'take
out' Iran on their behalf”, says John Whitbeck, correctly describing this claim
as “psychedelic”. (In reality, “[t]he [Arab] street would be thrilled if any
Muslim state within reach of Israel (even a non-Arab and Shiite one) were to
acquire nuclear weapons and establish a ''balance of fear" in place of the
unilateral terror of the past four decades,” Whitbeck avers.)
It is possible to convince Americans that this psychedelic
claim is correct: The Masters of Discourse can convince the majority of US
citizens of anything at all, even of Gray Aliens. Americans were convinced that
the Vietcong were soon to land in California, that Saddam Hussein has WMD and
that Iraqis would embrace the US Marines as their liberators, so they can be
convinced again and again, until such time as they undo the brainwashing yoke of
the Masters. But the Arabs won’t take it, just as the Iraqis did not. For the
next move, Bush must deliver some progress in Palestine. It can’t be true
progress of course, because Palestine is the core, the final goal; it will be
enough if it just looks like a step forward.
That is why Bush went on with the futile farce of Annapolis.
If you believe Annapolis and Bush’s visit have moved the notorious “peace
process” forward one inch, you do not need an Electric Monk, the device
described by Douglas Adams as a machine created to believe anything people find
hard to believe – you can beat this machine at its own game! The soon-to-retire
Catholic Patriarch of Jerusalem, Msgr Michel Sabbah correctly explained in his
Christmas talk: “A new peace effort was begun these last few weeks. In order for
it to succeed, there must be a firm willingness to make peace. Until now, there
has been no peace, simply because there has been no willingness to make it” and
he pointed out “the strong party, the one with everything in hand, the one who
is imposing occupation on the other”. Indeed Israel does not want a peace
acceptable to Palestinians, but it [along with President Bush] wants peace on
its own terms.
The Arabs understand this as well as anybody. Even the most
pro-Western Arab mainstream paper, the Gulf News of Abu Dhabi,
wrote a “Letter to George W. Bush” saying: “You said that your
current tour aims to realise the long neglected peace in the Middle East.
Regional peace will not be achieved by escalating tension and threatening to
change regimes. And most importantly, it will not be achieved by supporting
Israel, which continues to defy international law, occupy Arab lands, oppress
the Palestinians and rebuff peace initiatives.”
Al Jazeera says referring to ‘analysts’ that “the US president is too late
in his calls to Arab allies to confront Iranian 'extremism', as key American
allies in the Arab world have thrown their weight behind a growing rapprochement
with Iran… American fumbling in the Middle East has pushed Arabs to adopt
dialogue with the Islamic Republic”.
Russia’s rejection of the sanctions against Iran was also
instrumental in creating the weather change, and it is possible to say that Bush
missed his chance for building an anti-Iranian coalition. However, Western
anti-Iranian propaganda did influence many Arabs; even the relatively friendly
site of Iraqi resistance,
www.uruknet.info, publishes terrible diatribes against “the Persians”. Dr
Theodor Reik wrote that people and cultures always trip on the same rake: the
Arabs were tricked once into supporting England against the Ottoman Empire. The
result was sad; but will this experience keep them from repeating the error, or
will they support the US against the Iranians, if offered some convincing
performance by Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas? Palestine is still the key.