Not Another Peace Plan
It is warm in the low hills bordering the plain; purple-dark
turmus, lupines, a favourite flower of March, run along the dirt
track from the refugee camp to a nearby quarry. The place is
swarming with soldiers, who assist the security in the selection
job. Men are separated from their womenfolk; they are handcuffed
by mass-produced plastic handcuffs, standard black sacks on
their heads. They are taken to the quarry, beaten, some are
shot, and some are tortured. Their houses were demolished by
huge Caterpillar machines. Twenty men are executed by 8 o’clock.
It is another morning of ethnic cleansing in Palestine.
In another world, twenty miles away, Israelis fight with heavy
road traffic. It is another day of shopping and entertainment.
In the Qiriya government buildings, politicians and officials
discuss the Saudi Peace plan. HRH Prince Abdullah proposed to
Israel full acceptance of the Arab world in exchange for full
withdrawal from territories occupied in 1967. Israeli responses
show the true difference between opposing streams of Israeli
public opinion.
Brutal Sharon and his right-wing followers flatly reject the
proposal. They do not give a damn about Arab recognition.
Liberal Peres of Labour party replies as follows: Yes, we gladly
accept the Saudi Peace plan. It is a great plan, and Prince’s
idea to recognise and accept Israel is a wonderful thing. Surely
we won’t give up the lands or withdraw, but the plan is good.
In the quid pro quo trade, the Jewish ‘Left’ is for the quid.
Quo can wait, as it waited last fifty years. Israeli Right is
not all that much interested even in playing the game of ‘peace
process’.
The purpose of this game is to calm the frayed nerves of
contemporaries, who became witnesses of an unpleasant thing, a
Palestinian Holocaust. It is hard to live without hope, and that
is why fertile minds invent new proposals, new frameworks and
discussion tables. While the proposals are being discussed, the
Holocaust goes on. Palestine is destroyed, Palestinians murdered
and tortured, and it is still the first stage of the new an-Nakba.
In today’s (12.03.2002) Haaretz, Amnon Barzilai reports on the
new opinion poll carried out by Jaffe Institute for Strategic
Studies. According to it, 46% of Jews in Israel support mass
deportation (transfer) of the Palestinians. If the question is
asked in more ‘soft’ form, the support for the Final Solution
raises to 60%.
Nazis never openly declared their intention to massacre Jews and
Gypsies, they spoke of ‘deportation’ and ‘transfer’ as of their
‘Final Solution’. Even in 1938, these ideas have not had such
wholehearted support in Nazi Germany, as they have now in the
Jewish state.
But what is the Jewish state? Is it Israel, the small sliver of
land in the Middle East? How would it be able to bend the will
of Europeans and Americans? The Jewish historian, Solomon Lurie,
author of the fundamental study of anti-Semitism in antiquity,
spoke of a ‘non-territorial Jewish nation-state’. Now this
powerful non-territorial state stretching from New York to
Moscow accepted Nazi doctrine as its policy and genocide as its
praxis. A good example is provided by the Jewish American law
professor from Harvard, Alan Dershowitz, who writes in Sir
Conrad Black’s owned Jerusalem Post: “the first act of
[Palestinian] terrorism should result in the destruction of a
small village which has been used as a base for terrorist
operations. The residents would be given 24 hours to leave, and
then troops will come in and bulldoze all of the buildings”. It
was the standard practice of Nazi troops in occupied Europe.
Provided that Dershowitz and others of that ilk taught American
students for a generation, while Black and his comrades-in-arms
busily promoted this agenda, it is not strange that the US gives
its full support to the Judeo-Nazi war machine. Rumours of the
impending US attack on Iraq and Saudi Arabia were designed to
freeze the neighbouring Arab nations in the state of horrified
expectation.
Apparently they succeeded. The Saudi Prince Abdullah probably
understands as well as anybody in the Middle East that any
‘peace proposal’ will be utilised by Zionists in order to stall
the talks and to go on with their homicidal plans. But he
apparently felt his first duty was to his people, to the Saudis,
threatened by the Damocles’ Sword of the US Air Force. There is
not a slight chance for this or other peace plan, be it Zinni,
Tenet, or Mitchell plan. In 1970-72, a whole set of peace
proposals were produced by Jarring and other statesmen. Israel
used the time to beef up its Bar-Lev line along the Suez, while
stalling or rejecting proposals. The pattern repeated itself
after Madrid and Oslo.
The Judeo-Nazi plans are laid out. The media they control
stifles reporting and discussion of the Palestinian Holocaust,
the US Armed Forces provide them with total protection. Their
hand can not be stayed. Not by the ritual peace proposals,
anyway.
Instead of this waste of words, HRH Prince Abdullah and other
leaders should move their country’s currency deposits from
dollar to Euro and gold. Non-Islamic interest-taking banking
must be outlawed as other form of loan sharking. We can do the
same, and add a full scale boycott of newspapers and professors
supporting the genocide in Palestine.
Mankind still has a chance to save Palestinians and to save
oneself. Dershowitz, Black and Co should be treated as
accessories to Sharon’s war crimes, and the Jewish state must be
deNazified, as thoroughly as Germany after 1945.
i.
Click here
ii.
Click here
|