A great black laugh at
paedophilia
By
Maria
Poumier (co-edited by Michel
Mirin)
Since the admittance of
massive paedophilia by US catholic Church, which is
obviously a great vindication for Synagogue* -after 2000
years, we should pay attention to attacks on sexual grounds
as massive destruction weapons aimed at destroying
traditional beliefs and behaviours. In our case, modern
passions are actually being used as the greatest adversary
of the Passion of Christ, to which there seems to be no
answer but giving up. This is not the first time priests are
antagonized about a projected special lust, only that we
were put aback by its totally unexpected disguise. But
Synagogue went too far, this time, and will be defeated from
a very remote and united level, as it has been in early
times. Shamir already denounces all these accusations as the
bluff they are. But the Western world is still mired in the
discourse of Synagogue, so it can be useful, perhaps, to
analyse it from changed perspectives.
*) I am using the word
Synagogue as in the old times, as the materialization of
some kind of “Judaism that is nowadays almost the ethical
spiritual hegemonic attitude of the intellectuals as if it
were the ‘natural’ form of what we may call, in traditional
terms, Jewish spirituality” (Slavoj
Zizek, The Puppet and the Dwarf,
2005).
1) We can observe many uses of
sexualised convictions, in order to weaken the natural
immunity of one culture against the attacks of other ones.
For example, the question of female circumcision is used to
undermine African self-esteem. Nobody would dare, of course,
to remind that circumcision of male just born babies is a
definite attempt against their basic right to physical
integrity that should be written down in the Universal Human
Rights Declaration, and is not. This case demonstrates that
we can turn over the whole machine of sexualised moral
weapons, if we accept an external point of view. And that
which probably seems the external, excluded a priori point
of view would be the only one able to undo the mortal
machinery because it is much more central than how it
appears at first.
In fact, paedophilia is the
ruling underlining pattern of our media-dominated culture,
since every speech or show tells and teaches our children
day and night about the various ways to get sex; their will,
conscious and unconscious is suffused with sex, without any
agreement nor significant
counterpart coming from parents nor children, school,
governments, or any religion at all.
2) Everybody rejects
paedophilia, but laicity and
respect of the individual, altogether with freedom of
enterprise is the principle that nurture it. Legal
paedophilic propaganda is not seen as freedom for dirty
money, but freedom of communication, transparency, culture.
As a result, we feel trapped, enslaved by sex-culture, and
don’t know how to escape from it. This is not limited to the
capitalist world. Sub-comandante
Marcos, in the Mayas’ jungle of Chiapas, mentions “gay,
lesbian and transsexual minorities” between the varieties of
people his movement defends, though, as any guerrilla in the
world, Latin American fighters are seen as the paradigm of
machismo. Raul Castro’s wife and after her, his daughter
Mariela, are some kind of gay,
lesbian and transsexual rights ministers in Cuba.
Jews are supposed to be the
great defenders of minorities and transsexual rights. Only
that as a religion, Judaism is absolutely opposed to sexual
vagabondage. Terrific tales as Sodom and Gomorrah’s, or Lot
and his daughters, have their modern scientific version in
the pervasive sexual obsession of incest between little
babies and their parents in Freudian culture. On the other
hand, in the goys’ world, Jewish traders and businessmen
have always been involved in the sex business, and in the
slave trade. We use to forget that both things are linked,
because we are supposed to have slavery abolished about some
150 years ago. But some people remember more than others
those long trends in history, especially those who still
feel terribly defeated and for that reason oppose logic much
stronger than others’.
3)
Afrocentricity: African-centered
thought is a religious one; the scientific renaissance of
African anthropologists and archaeologists cannot be
separated from a religious revolution. They are building a
holistic modern knowledge, confronting western secularized
science and philosophies that rest on the elimination of
faith as an intellective tool. Egyptologists tell us that in
the ancient African world, united by monotheism and one
common language, some ideas just did not exist, such as
slavery, prison or prostitution. Such words cannot be found
in the ancient hieroglyphs, nor can any drawing suggesting
such institutions, while they describe any concrete social
reality of ancient Egypt. Islam and Christianity spread
easily in the African world because of their theological
African roots and qualities; Africans recognize in the
figure of Christ a completely traditional African figure, as
Mathew (2/13-20) suggests, when telling about Jesus
travelling to Egypt; the Prophet found arguments in the anti
Judaic black Hanifism; and found
support in the black communities of Mecca and Medina, his
black friend Bilal being a great
initiate.
To our days, the sense of
family remains very strong between Blacks, even out of
Africa, for an existential reason: they feel biologically
threatened as a race, by Whites; so their self defence
cannot be individual, in any sense. From their point of
view, collective rights are the previous ground for any
claim of individual rights: they feel global Europe denies
to global Africa the right to breathe as a continent, as to
eat, grow, develop safely, in harmony with it’s local
nature. The traditional African medicine and psychiatry also
consists in taking care of the family health, not only that
of the individual asking for help. Every medicine contains 3
elements: mineral, vegetal, animal; and will save only if
the connection with ancestors intervenes, by way of
invocations and prayers, which is a kind of guarantee
against the foolishness of Faust’s or Mephistopheles’
medical inventions. This control of any technological
discovery, by tradition and collective faith, explains how
there were no disabled children in Africa, before European
doctors came: Divination would tell should a mother not
carry to its end the birth of some baby, as a failed
reincarnation of an ancestor. So the whole community helped
her to give the battle for some necessary sacrifice, as the
community sustains any of its members in other battles, for
birth, access to adultness, pain and death. Science,
religion, private happiness meet without conflict, in the
vivid African civilization, so a difficult decision is never
so solitary and dramatic as it is in the modern Western one.
Nor homosexuality, paedophilia or incest have chance to
develop, in such context; as a matter of fact, circumcision,
as a pre-Islamic habit, means the acceptation of a
definitive cut off from infancy and from the other gender’s
characteristics. This has nothing to do with the meaning of
Jewish circumcision, as a sign of election.
4) Any western and modern
person will ask help from an African “sorcerer”, in case of
very great pain and despair, especially in case of bad
illness of a beloved child. Far from being unlearned or
weak, the ones with great responsibilities, such as
Mitterrand, Chirac or maybe Sarkozy,
the same as Lula or Castro, have their African “marabouts”
and rely on them for some of their advices. So the
connection between white and black civilizations exists at
the same level where sex acts, that of secrecy, privacy,
death and life questions, and, yes, the exercise of power.
That is why marabouts don’t ask
for recognition as other paramedical professions: they just
address you as the one who will make you a winner in love,
health and wealth matters. So the passion link between Black
and White worlds is active above any sociological or
ideological sense of hostility between the two worlds. And,
as a matter of fact, the darkest beauty fascinates the
palest people just as pale beauty charms the obscure ones:
Michael Jackson is a creation of the northern racialist
societies, while mulatto salsa is the miracle of mixed
southern ones.
5) In political, economic and
class struggle, the black side uses the accusation of
discrimination and white racism as a very effective weapon,
one nobody can object to openly, because it is as rational
as ethical; on the other side, there is still just an
automatic use of any kind of power to keep instinctively
away from decisional levels anyone who may endanger the
physiological basis of ‘that’ domination. That is why black
defenders of the black world are a permanent target for
Cointelpro operations, and
division between Blacks is always encouraged by traders, the
ones who need weakness and destruction of spiritual
resistance in order to spread. As long as we respect
traders’ interests, we are consolidating any kind of
enslavement: treating black and white persons as cattle, as
prisoners for ever, who have sex as prisoners, as the only
escape from spiritual destruction. Jean Genet, the gay,
robber and defender of Palestine, explains it perfectly.
6) The recognition of African
civilization is the ground and condition of any global
European renaissance. This is unacceptable for our enemies,
the Zionist minded ones. Eastern Europeans don’t feel that
necessity, probably because they still have a spiritual
force, organized by orthodox faith, and a very short African
history, so they just reject (and sometimes do kill!)
Africans as uncalled invaders.
But Western countries’ wealth was built with enslaved black
people labour, and spiritual enslavement now inhabits us as
a cancer, from children to elders, now completely disabled
to transmit any ancestral, traditional wisdom. Let us accept
the African speech and its claims of justice, and our soul
will be saved. This will be the restoration of real
knowledge, instead of Mephistopheles’ inventiveness
devouring our poor abstract ghost hunger of religion. If the
African world seems too far for some of us, we can access to
it by its whiter translation: the Sufi Islamic tradition,
absolutely marvellous, altogether a theological,
philosophical, scientific and aesthetic paradise for our
western desertified and thirsty
minds. But we should not submit to any Semitic paradigm as
the key one, because the Semitic nomad world was based on
conquest and enslavement, the same as the northern one,
Japheth’s. And has not renounced, yet, its’ sense of
religious election and superiority against Black
civilization, while Africa is absolutely anti-Zionist. After
defeating with its absolutely powerful anti-racist discourse
the South African racist and Israel fuelled domination,
global Africa shouted with a world wide voice that Israel is
still the paradigm of racism, at the Durban UN conference in
2001; as we should remember, just a few days after that,
perhaps as a divine echo,
three
Twin Towers collapsed. But unless the Arabs don’t
recognize their debt to Black Africa, they will not win
against USrael. Palestine,
earlier called Canaan, was black once upon a time; Moses,
son of Egypt, was mulatto, as were medieval Moors also;
Santiago Matamoros, the
Palestinian saint James who was brandished by Christian
Reconquista as an ancestor, is
represented in every Spanish church as smashing under his
horse’s feet a black suffering body. In Argentina, the
whitest country of South America, any peasant or poor is
insulted as “negro”, though they are just descendants of
native America. The whole antizionist
cultures and people should recognize that
negrophobia is a mental
unconscious barrier that many of us share with Zionists. It
is time to learn that there are some satanic verses in the
Bible, those that enumerate precisely the accursed
descendants of Ham: Canaan, Kush,
Mitsraim,
Puth (Genesis 10/32), precisely
located black regions in those times.
7) The extreme right wing,
Zionists as much as anti-Zionists, claim that the white
world should defend its identity against black immigration
and cultural impulse. Alain Finkelkraut,
a former leftist free-minded writer, and now almost
hegemonic speaker in France, fights for Israel and helps
Jews to appear as the natural defenders of European most
legitimate sense of white culture. But this is a fig-leaf
for the simple, normal fear to lose properties and
privileges. The same supposedly elite never protested
against black demographic and cultural invasion in their
conquered sugar islands, because they were the first eaters
of sugar, a very refined thing, only for aristocratic taste,
at the beginning. Traders succeeded to make all of us eat
bloody sugar, and our civilization grew by devouring more
and more enslaved flesh. The Maya’s
Popol Vuh says mankind
was destroyed twice by God, because it was not able to
honour Him in His creatures; the last one survives as far as
it is made of maize, the American native food. Jesus too
told us to eat bread and drink wine instead of practicing
human sacrifice and cannibalism; so let us stop eating our
brothers, and perhaps we may survive. It is revolutionary to
fight for that; it is nothing new, but every new age
requires that battle. And it means a great sacrifice for all
kind of slave owners. Cuba is a very strong country because
it fought at the same time for abolition of slavery and
independence from Spain, since 1868; concretely, it means
that the Cuban landowners, who felt oppressed by Spaniards,
made an alliance with their own slaves: they set them free,
and the former slaves gave their blood and spiritual
strength for infantry and cavalry victories. José Marti, the
Cuban spiritual warrior and Latin American Prophet, did the
titanic job of uniting the whitish elite with the more
denied and oppressed ones showing them how much they shared,
and succeeded. As he lived as a poor immigrant in New York,
he knew perfectly about the spiritual weakness of the US; he
believed that the Cuban racial and class marriage he was
arranging would make Cuba stronger than any imperial US
expansionism. He was certainly right. We must do the same in
Europe, now that we feel the need of liberating us from
USrael as a foreign domination.
No revolution can succeed without abolition of privileges,
sacrifice of properties, and giving equality to the ones who
are actually asking for it. I ought these lessons to the
African thinkers, as translated to me and many other white
listeners by some books [1], but mostly by plain unknown
people who know and transmit the best, perhaps the most
difficult things, the vital ones for all of us.
8) Just a few points:
preventive answers to some objections. Nasty
Finkielkraut is balanced by the
Jewish involvement in black claims; in France, CRIF (Conseil
Représentatif des Institutions
Juives) recently created CRAN (Conseil
Représentatif des Associations
Noires); Michel
Wieworka, a big defender of
Israel, is it’s generous
godfather. But most Blacks don’t feel represented at all by
this artificial official and infiltrated structure, and it
is already collapsing…. As a matter of fact, transatlantic
slaves’ trade was a very ecumenical business: Pope Nicolas V
allowed and boosted with the official
Romanus Pontifex bull, in
1554, the Portuguese traders to capture and enslave the
Africans. These Portuguese were mainly Jewish, as the
Vatican’s bankers. Northern Protestants followed, France and
at last Spain allowed its own catholic subjects to enter in
that business [2]. If Jewishness
is how Jews behave more than what their best writings are
proud about, probably Christianity and
Africanity too are a double
face stuff. But our times require us not to remain wrapped
and trapped by our sticky sophisms. After being colonizers,
we feel colonized. That is why we need specially the former
colonized ones’ arguments. As Shamir says, it is time to
defend the real church, the one that cannot fail because “the
church affirms the primacy of spirit, and of the godlike
nature of man; and this is anathema to the Masters of
Discourse”. And it is impossible to do it without defending
real religious people and their representatives.
[1] As writings
in French, the
afrocentric thought of Cheikh
Anta Diop and his followers
Théophile
Obenga, René Louis Etilé,
Doumbi-Fakoly, as writers in
French; in Spanish, the Cuban black fighters Juan
Gualberto
Gómez, Nicolás
Guillén, Gustavo
Urrutia, Juan René Betancourt,
Walterio
Carbonell. And for the whites,
José Martí and
María
Zambrano, the Christian Sufi
Diotima of Andalucía.
[2] Surprisingly, Today,
Sunday [29 Jul 2007 09:10:30 +0000 (GMT)] French journalist
David Yankelowitz spread a mail
that may toll the end of the H Age; he asserts no serious
historian objects his conclusion that “the Atlantic slave
trade was almost a Jewish monopoly, 51% of the 11 to 15
million alive slaves who reached the ‘New World’ (while 63
to 610 million innocent Africans perished in this obscene
trade) were exploited in sugar plantations owned by
Marranos, and the sugar
industry, from production to commercialization, was for
centuries controlled by Jews, a kind of Jewish monopoly that
is still ruling nowadays” (david.yankelowitz@yahoo.fr).
As a matter of fact, the Christian countries did not object
this situation.