|
After our publication of
an essay Was Saddam Hussein
really the ruthless tyrant that American moralists claim he was?
by Bert Cooper Fairfax,
there were many responses (see below), and
Bert Cooper Fairfax responded
to them as follows:
The greatest danger to all of humanity right now is the
onrushing collapse of the Jewish religion. Those who understand
Moses, understand that he was a former slave who became an
Astronomer, of the first class, to whom history has given the
name of the most important scientific discovery ever!, in the
history of Man. Whereas our Moses was the first one to make
this discovery, he could not have read about it somewhere, as in
the Book of Genesis or something, which he (or someone else —
that's irrelevant) eventually wrote. This hard scientific
discovery, which can be easily replicated by children if they
are led through it, is that Man (that is the mind of man — Man
as a cognitive force in nature, this is, "of creation") is, like
the heavens above, being made in the Image of and Likeness with
the Creator. This discovery, which the nomads of ages past, now
called Zionists, hate, begins with noticing the irregular
motions of the planets amongst the stars, and then asking the
inevitable question, "What's that?" Eventually, in order to
answer that question, one must discover that God does not count
1 + 1 = 2, as a Zionist count, but God counts by dividing
Himself (One) harmonically, as He divided Himself to make the
planets, as He divided Himself to make the concomitant mind of
Man. This is a huge topic, but I'll knock it down (this is so
unfair!) to this question (which will require a thousand hours
of work, really play, on your part, should you decide to follow
through), Did you know that the five platonic solids can be
constructed entirely from harmonic principles. Euclid, who
counted realty by fantasizing points, lines, etc., was no less a
fraud than is the Zionist moneychangers who count 1 + 1 = two
for us and none for you. So, then, if the solids represent
efficient creation of space, purely by rotational action and by
negentropic modulation thereof, and if the solids are thought of
as creating an inner space within its insphere, and an outer
space without its outsphere, then would it be significant (and
here's the big one) that from Mercury to Neptune (Moses of
course could only have measured out to Saturn, but that is
irrelevant), the orbits of the planets, which might be thought
of as annular discs with inner and outer radii of the respective
perihelion to aphelion distances, "fit" the inspheres and
outspheres of a nesting of intervening solids, to an average
error of less than 2%, and a maximum error of 4% (Mercury,
always the flyer). I defy you or anyone to find any principle
of astronomy, which extends from Mercury to Neptune, across
eight planets and seven intervening spaces, which fits that
well. Modern astronomic scatter-plots, with bandwidths of
errors of 50% are often proclaimed as a near perfect fits — this
model for the harmonic quantization of space and time, from
Mercury to Neptune, fits observed reality to astoundingly small
errors, again and again across 14 interfaces — what is the
probability that a 2% error would occur again and again, from
Mercury to Neptune, fourteen times in a row? The celestial
system, from Mercury to Neptune (again Moses could only have
explained this to his fellow slaves out to Saturn) is organized
entirely on principles of harmonics — that creation of space
(space between the planets being quantized by the 5 platonic
solids), and of time (motion within and between the planets is
quantized "musically"). The ratios of the motions planets,
again from Mercury to Neptune, can be seen to form a kind of
harmonic "scale" of 7 octaves, about which considerably more
work needs to be done and about which, sadly, there is no
shortage of pre-supposers who will try to force observations
into their "correct answer" based on their preconceived notion
of reality, as Euclid did. What I am saying is that Kepler
re-discovered, or was forced to think through again, that which
Moses has already long ago discovered, and which discovery can
be replicated by the human mind of any child, beginning at
around age 12 to 15.
In any case, as Moses made this verifiably simple discovery (it
takes about ten years to work it through by yourself), and as he
began to share his struggles with it, and discuss it with his
fellow workers, many of whom were slaves just like him, and he
began to see that his fellow slaves also fully grasped the
underlying harmonic principles — it thus became inevitable that
they all, astronomers, slaves and freemen alike, realized that
their minds together were grasping and communicating something
new, which was very profound. This comprehensive understanding,
which has as its scientific root the powers of intellect and
compassion, was the true source of Moses' leadership. It was
the compassion and intellect of Moses that produced the
willingness of his following. Ask yourself, How did Moses gain
so large a following, that he might organize the largest
political "breakout" in the history of mankind? By snapping the
whips of scorn, or the humiliation of magic into the faces of
his loyal followers? So, How? There was no one who could have
read the Book of Genesis to him, that he might acquire his
anointing, by proclamation. So, again, How! did he get the
courage walk up to old Pharaoh, and announce, "Sorry, big
fellah, but we are so outta here," as the kids say now. "Oh,"
said old Pharaoh with his usual smirk, "Where ya gunna go to —
some promised land?" "Exactly!" said Moses, thinking quickly on
his feet, "That's it … the Promised Land!" "Oh," said old
Pharaoh smirking again, "and, where might I go to conquer this
so-called promise of dirt" To which Moses answered, "It's a
place for the pursuit of happiness, founded on principles of
intellect and compassion, which I, and my followers, have
discovered together, a discovery that we share through the unity
of man all of the cosmos, through the provable unity of the mind
of man with that of the creator, as verified by the motions of
the planets" said Moses, "though we have a long path before us,
it is a place with no bounds, which sadly, you, Ol' Pharaoh,
preoccupied with indolence and greed as you have become, with
the edifices of your fixitude, can no longer see." Sensing that
"something was up," Pharaoh's publicists immediately began to
"write down" the Mosaic discovery, that the cornerstones of
intellect and compassion might begin to grind themselves back
into dust. They did so by describing "the Promised Land" … as
"a patch of dirt" a patch of dirt, easily to be fenced in and
bounded.
The Zionist proclaims, So great was God's love, that gift to his
"chosen" was a patch of dirt! A patch of dirt! From here, to
here, and here. See it? A patch of dirt! A god-damned patch
of dirt! The entirety of God's Universe, of which He is a part,
stands before us, of which We are a part, and we are to proclaim
that, His gift to us, with all the responsibilities of his
"chosen" if you like, was an indescribably small patch of dirt,
which Ol' Pharaoh might one day build a fence around, as he
might fence in a herd of sheep.
How did the Zionists lead us into this "patch of dirt"
cul-de-sac?
Israel Shamir is one of very few who are nudging the cusp of
history, and making a very important contribution, which goes
completely in the right direction (no insult intended). This is
especially the case as regards the one-state solution for
Palestine. I would like to add some quick thoughts if I may, to
support and develop that idea.
The necessity of the one-state solution is that the principles
of intellect and compassion, which originate in Mosaic Judaism,
must be restored, if for no other reason than the fact that
these two cornerstones, the intellect and compassion of the
Jewish religion, are the cornerstones of all subsequent
religions. Like it or not, the Mosaic-Jewish religion, Moses
being the first to discover and verify that Man's mind is made
in as an image of and in likeness with, the Creator, based as it
is on proven organizational power of sharing of scientific
discovery, as proved by the historic political breakout
organized by the slave-astronomer named Moses, the Jewish
religion is arguably the tap-root of all subsequent religions,
certainly of the Christian and Mohammedan ones. If the two
cornerstones of this "tap-root" were to be set against each
other, such that intellect grinds its companion, compassion,
down to dust, and compassion grinds its companion, intellect,
down to dust, the contributions of Moses will be lost to
Mankind, the Judaic tap root will fail, and with it all "upper"
religions which depend upon it for water will fail too, and the
world will really descend into a dark age, ruled by fascist
nomads. This is exactly the plan of the Zionists, who as
wandering nomads, as usurpers, thieves and jackals, have somehow
stolen the mantles of Abraham and Moses from us while we were
sleeping. (This goes back to the initial design intention of
Israel, by the oligarchs, who adopted the appellation Zionist,
by proclaiming Zion to be … a Patch of Dirt! The formation of
Israel, as a means of destroying the ongoing Mosaic breakout,
begins with the oligarchical reaction against the American
Revolution, and the 1802 assassination of Alexander Hamilton,
who was the real force of intellect and compassion behind the
American Revolution. With his birth and parentage on an island
oddly similar to that of Moses, just prior to his assassination
Hamilton was beginning to organize a Christian Constitutionalist
Society, but his assassination and the war of 1812 put his plans
in suspension. Then, some students from Williams College in
Massachusetts saw the seed of Hamilton's idea and it took hold
in them — they organized a similar society (name escapes me for
the moment) and they launched a small group of Hamiltonian
missionaries in the 1840's, one of whom went to Hawaii and who
later educated Sun Yat Sen, another of whom went to Palestine,
and founded the "University" in what later became the American
University in Lebanon. Teaching the economic power of
Hamilton's discovery of the role of sovereignty in banking and
credit (which I liken to Moses' discovery of the powers of
intellect and compassion in political organization of a breakout
of the mind of man), and teaching Lincoln's verification of
Hamilton's discovery, the American University became immensely
successful — its first students became its professors, and their
students then began forming nations and banks and machine shops,
on principles of sovereignty of the compassionate and
intelligent human mind, and starting nation building on
"American-Hamiltonian" principles of science. By 1865, e.g.
when Lincoln defeated the British in the American Civil War, the
oligarchy had realized that this breakout of Hamiltonian
principles of sovereignty, and Lincolnian principles of machine
shop productivity, in the "land of the Palaces" was dangerous
threat to the nomadicity and darkness of their way of life —
darkness being only a momentary usurpation of light.)
A two state solution, will first of all only result in a quick
"3-days" war, launched by godless Israel against a helpless
Palestinian people. In a two state solution, Palestine may
exist for a few hours, at which time the Mossad will contrive a
convenient provocation to victory, whereby Israel will, by
extermination of its helpless invader, fulfil the theoretical
entirety the Zionist dream, of "owning God's patch of Dirt."
The end result of Jimmy Carter's two-state solution, will
immediately be a one state solution, but by the path of violence
and waste, and with the intentional absence of reason and
compassion, e.g. by the destruction of the two main cornerstones
of the Jewish religion.
In reference to the JewTube, I call it the One-eyed Marxist
Truth Tube. This particular manifestation of "truth tube" has
an endless array of prettyboy ejaculators and prettygirl
ejaculatresses behind it, "that" incessantly spew their Marxist
propaganda, spewing, spewing, spewing — spewing up in our living
rooms until we are all knee deep in their clueless goo. After a
while, you can't even walk across your own living room without
getting the soles of your shoes dirty with it. In America, when
a young mother goes to the grocery store to buy vegetables and
meat for dinner say, with her two toddlers on her hips, at the
end of her shopping she has to navigate through a gauntlet, ten
to twenty feet in length, of display racks, covered in brightly
printed but very scientific pornography ("Cosmopolitan" magazine
will have some frightened young girl freezing a bikini and
leering out a headline, How to have sex in 100 new ways [and
therefore please your depraved husband] — "People" magazine will
have a headline, Hollywood Celebrities have a Real life, You can
have one too! — How to divorce your husband for free, and keep
the car and house, etc.) In America, a mother cannot even buy
food for her children, except that she navigate them past a
gauntlet of enchanting pornography, during the "checkout"
process at the cash register. We are so stupid, we then wonder
why our children grow up believing in video reality.
Peter, I wouldn't worry about Big Truth or Big Lie too much, as
though one might be carried in one's left pant's pocket, and the
other in the right. Both are in the process of creation, by
human participation with, or against, God, as Moses discovered
in the harmonic motions of the planets, and in the concomitant
understanding available to every human mind, of how the
celestial motions work, and of how Moses and Hamilton and
Lincoln gave understanding freely of their minds to their
friends, and thus freely organized the required breakout.
Regards,
Bert
====
From:
Peter Budarick
Very good article. I have been saying similar
things since 1999. It is so easy to vilify someone one does not
know. I always say to people who vilify someone. "Go and meet
the man and live and work with him for year, then come back to
me and tell me".
Most people live in images and on gossip and
love illusions and need Hollywood and the JewTube to feed all
them fiction. Fiction is so much nicer than truth which latter
is frightfully strange for them! They are incompetent as
creatives so they take on board the fictional products of God's
Chosen, who having miraculously avoided being gassed or
turned into soap, spend their time polluting the minds of the
sheeple and rake in the money.
There is a theorem called the Budarick
Theorem. It states that in regard to truth which is not
verifiable by simple direct observation, the more people believe
something the higher the probability what they believe is either
the opposite, an exaggeration or a BIG LIE.
When near 100% of people believe
something like the "Holocaust" or the "Big Bang Theory" [neither
is verifiable by simple direct observation] then you can be near
certain it is false and you can find evidence to support what is
false and what is truth. In other words in these extreme cases
[near the limits of 100% and 0%] evidence always exists to show
that what is believed is False AND also evidence always exists
to show what the truth actually is or was [of course this
evidence is often denied to the researcher which helps to prove
that what is lie].
The Budarick Theorem does not always work. It
is only a statistical tool and must be used intelligently
together with genuine research. It can however save you a lot of
time chasing down dead end paths. Anyone who has lived a long
time and done research knows that my Theorem is useful.
I personally do not believe anything unless i
have researched it myself, however because my time is limited i
use the Budarick Theorem to get at the truth or big lie as
quickly as possible. Of course one needs to know how to traverse
the emissions of expert groups who will publish only what is
acceptable to the group [and thus one needs to know how to find
dissident views]. You will encounter this when you research the
big lies and many other such wrong beliefs. Here again the
Budarick Theorem is useful because it works for expert groups
also. When you get 100% belief in something and no dissenting
views are allowed by the expert group then you know it is not
true. But you may still have to work very hard to find out what
actually is or was true.
Peter
From Arthur Topham
Dear Bert.
Greetings from your northern neighbour. The above article
appeared on a list in the U.K. (<SiriusIntelligence@yahoogroups.com>)
which I am on and it hit home like nothing I’ve read in a long,
long time. I’m writing merely to say thank your for penning it
and expressing some basic ideas that rarely reach the general
public.
I have been publishing for a number of years, both hardcopy (The
Radical) and online, an alternative news site ( http://www.radicalpress.com
) and like I said I don’t normally see the ideas that you’ve put
forth appearing in most of what we normally accept as
“alternative” media. You will find such ideas on my site but
then, generally speaking, it is an exception to the rule.
Drawing the comparison between the policies that Saddam
introduced into Iraq with those implemented in the US system
raised the level of discussion to one that transcends the usual
Zionist rhetoric; a level all to familiar to those who have
studied the Zionist mindset and their machinations over the past
century or so.
Not that it will likely do you any good in the long run when it
comes to the typical reaction of the Zionist forces I also
appreciated your upfront acknowledgment of your Jewish ancestry.
While you will be condemned outright as a “self-hating Jew” for
those of us Goyim who are perpetually painted as “anti-Semites”
whenever we offer any critiques of political Zionism it’s
refreshing that you prefaced your article by putting that card
on the table beforehand.
Putting China into its proper context was another point that you
brought up which needed, and still needs, much greater
emphasizing.
And much more which you delineated with lucidity, poignancy and,
in the case of ol’ Osama, great humour! :-)
Hopefully we will see more of your work in the future.
So again, thanks for the analysis and the best in 2007.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Radical Press
--------------------
|
